Habby4Life
Registered User
- Nov 12, 2008
- 3,387
- 2,925
yeah, if we get Duchene, KK is probably better in the NHL but on the wing.
It's not a conversation for now, so there's no point in posting it really, but if we did manage to get Duchene, I'd rather see KK developing in the AHL at center, playing 20 minutes a night in all situations, than playing 4th line wing or center. Perhaps he could learn a lot as a 4c. But I'm definitely fine with KK being that top nine winger you want to get. I think many are scared of KK starting out on the wing because Galchenyuk didn't work. Galchenyuk didn't work at C because he's not a C, not because he started out on the wing. KK is a C, and will be fine playing the wing until he's strong enough/physically mature enough to handle the 200 foot game and grind down low of being an NHL C. Big difference.
Absolutely there is no comparison to galchenyuk. KK has demonstrated he can play c, and is comfortable there. He just needs to get stronger. He looks like a natural center and won’t lose that ability with some time on the wing. Galchenyuk looked lost and still does at c.
I’m torn as to what is the best development path for KK. Tough call 3c or 4c.