LMAO all you want, but Canes aren't trading an unprotected 1st, ALONG with Skinner unless the return is better than a guy who scores goals at a similar rate to Skinner AND is a UFA at seasons end, just like Skinner. And your reasoning on Petry is he scored 40 points THIS year so his value is close to Skinner. So if this year's points are how you are rating value of players, then Skinner scored 24G, 49P > Pac's 17G, 37 points. Even last year, Skinner's 37G, 63P is pretty much the same as Pac's 35G, 67 points. I love how "skinner has regressed" but "pacs is worth more." To quote you, LMAO.
Re: Petry and Lehks. If Canes are dealing Skinner, they are likely looking for forward help, not D. And Petry had a career year which is totally inconsistent with any other year in his NHL career. Trading for a guy, or signing a guy that suddenly hits a career high at 30 years old rarely turns out well. Skinner had three 30G+ seasons and has AVERAGED 29G/82 games throughout his career. Lehks is nothing special and more of the same for what the Canes have.
The Pac's deal is much closer, although not with a 2019 1st. The 2nd deal is ridiculous, especially when you take into account the make-up of the Canes (Slavin, Hanifin, Fleury, Bean, Pesce, Faulk, TVR, etc..)