spintheblackcircle
incoming!!!
- Mar 1, 2002
- 66,303
- 12,240
Wennberg might be playing with Panarin and Bjorkstrand tomorrow.
Torts interview said he needs to get AW playing with people who don’t play dump and chase.
Duclair to stay with PLD and cam?
Wennberg has 1 goal in his last 40 games.
Wow.
Wennberg has 1 goal in his last 40 games.
Wow.
I've actually been thinking that this might be a fun line to try for awhile. Panarin and Wennberg might conflict too much since they both play pass first, but I'd like to try it. If anyone can fire in some nice passes, its Bjork.Wennberg might be playing with Panarin and Bjorkstrand tomorrow.
Torts interview said he needs to get AW playing with people who don’t play dump and chase.
Duclair to stay with PLD and cam?
I think Panarin adapts to be what his line needs, he has proven to be able to score and be a playmaker. I like the thought of having 2 lines like that and giving Bjorkstrand a real chance. Im sure it wont last long but Andy would be a good option with Panarin-Wennberg aswellI've actually been thinking that this might be a fun line to try for awhile. Panarin and Wennberg might conflict too much since they both play pass first, but I'd like to try it. If anyone can fire in some nice passes, its Bjork.
I think Panarin adapts to be what his line needs, he has proven to be able to score and be a playmaker. I like the thought of having 2 lines like that and giving Bjorkstrand a real chance. Im sure it wont last long but Andy would be a good option with Panarin-Wennberg aswell
...someone who scored 43 goals for another team the next year?The last Jackets forward to score 1 in 40 while playing any substantial minutes was ... oh hell who cares.
Hahahah boom roasted!...someone who scored 43 goals for another team the next year?
If Wennberg starts scoring and gets confidence who knows what happens? (Maybe he has a goal scoring bonus too?)
This attitude bothers me - the implication that Wennberg can never be a useful player for the Jackets and that we must move him. I can presently see value in moving him, to be sure, but that doesn't make it an absolute requirement. Learn to adapt, y'all.Hopefully his trade value increases enough that we can trade him for a return that can improve the team in some sort of way.
This attitude bothers me - the implication that Wennberg can never be a useful player for the Jackets and that we must move him. I can presently see value in moving him, to be sure, but that doesn't make it an absolute requirement. Learn to adapt, y'all.
Tell me why Wennberg isn't the most obvious choice to be moved for the team to get a "shake up" or packaged with other assets for a legitimate upgrade from a "rebuilding" team.
...have you looked at the Trade Ideas Discussion Thread at all?He's been "useful". Dishing out assists on a very hot and efficient powerplay. Your attitude that the team couldn't get a MORE USEFUL player or be better without Wennberg is what bothers me.
...have you looked at the Trade Ideas Discussion Thread at all?
EDIT: Ah, I see you just posted in there about twenty minutes ago, and again just now. I recommend looking on the first page.
For someone who got rather testy with me w/r/t putting words in your mouth not too long ago, you sure seem eager to put words in mine. And if you don't see any point in reading what I have to say, then don't come back at me with whatever nonsense you've got in your head about me. I'll answer to criticisms of what I say, but not criticisms of fabricated caricatures.What's the point?
Even if its an upgrade that you couldn't or wouldn't acknowledge, you would say, "I don't see the upgrade, value, or point for the CBJ".
If it was an upgrade you couldn't deny, you would say, "why would this team downgrade"?
Wennberg is my least favorite player on the team. If he'd listen to his coaches and shoot the puck when he has the opportunity, he could be my favorite. Until then, his position could be upgraded.
Jones didn't take the bait about playing in Columbus and the Norris. Interesting he said the Panarin, Bob thing was an issue to start the season.
That is definitely true but he also usually is the one carrying the puck into the zone and he gets guarded tightly. If we had a left handed shooting threat opposite him I think it would help.Artemi is currently second only to Kucherov in 5v5 scoring rate. The Jackets incompetent powerplay is the one thing stopping him from a 100 pt season. Though I must say he isn't always helping the PP as much as he should.