Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
Nice try...but this is a "no Tanev" zone....that's been beaten to death.I don’t see many options here. Maybe Tanev?
Although you aleady know that which is why you posted it.
Nice try...but this is a "no Tanev" zone....that's been beaten to death.I don’t see many options here. Maybe Tanev?
I thought a 1st+2nd+2nd kind of was a pretty good payment for Petry...What would it take?
What would it take?
I thought a 1st+2nd+2nd kind of was a pretty good payment for Petry...
I respect that, but Liljegren is off limits. After watching him last year, he's not 3 years away.Probably Liljegren + some depth piece. I personally wouldn't want to consider something around Rasanen/Brooks/I forget who else.
It is, until those picks end up being something like 25/55 and take forever to develop. I'd rather have a really good prospect (that has already seen some promising development) + pick.
You're looking to boost your D now and Liljegren might take 2-3 years before he makes an impact (if he does).
I respect that, but Liljegren is off limits. After watching him last year, he's not 3 years away.
No offense but I am glad you guys didn't, after poaching JT idk if my heart could have handled you bagging both the Oshawa boys
But he was an Oshawa General alongside Tavares..?CDH is from Ottawa
I respect that, but Liljegren is off limits. After watching him last year, he's not 3 years away.
Nice try...but this is a "no Tanev" zone....that's been beaten to death.
Although you aleady know that which is why you posted it.
I thought a 1st+2nd+2nd kind of was a pretty good payment for Petry...
Hell I’d do it for a 5th
We paid a 3rd and a conditional 5th for Stone. At the time, there was belief that the Yotes could get up to a late first for Stone. The condition for the 5th was he re-signs in Calgary which we paid to Arizona. Honestly, I think the only reason we got that deal was because Stone's wife lives in Calgary and Chayka was doing him a solid, plus Chayka was possibly trying to smooth things over after Burke openly became angry about some GM spreading rumors about Dougie.
Sending him off for a 5th is giving Toronto a discount on Stone. Stone might not be the best option in a top 4, but he sure as hell isn't the worst option in the top 4. He played on the top pairing with OEL in Arizona and wasn't out of place on the second pairing in Calgary. He played on the 3rd line in Calgary because Gully wanted to spread the talent and preferred LHLD and RHRD pairings but did well on the second pairing with Hamonic when Brodie was injured. IMO, if TO acquired Stone, next season, they'd move another roster player for the necessary cap space, not Stone. I agree with others that he's a good player, but likely miscast in Gully's system.
I get that some of our fans want to move him for cap space, but Stone is not a cap dump. I think we should at least target what we paid for him (3rd + 5th) if we trade him. I think TO fans are ok with the idea of a conditional 2nd. I'd go with that.
I'm not sure any fanbase will volunteer that type of defender, who has 3+ years of team control, for a late 1st and a couple 2nds. It will most likely be quality for quality or pound sand and that's fair.
If it happens, it will be because of an external factor that fans won’t have accounted for or underestimated. That makes it difficult to predict, imo.
I think Dubas understands the Leafs will need a pipeline of cheap ELC talent to support their stars making big bucks.
I don't see him seeking out a deal that depletes our picks like this.
I think that largely depends on who youd ask. I dont think it would be terribly much. His last year was rough, but i think hes just trying to figure out how to adjust for the 'if you hit someone anywhere close to high, youre getting a penalty' rules.
It'd be tough getting rid of our only 'veteran' RHD, but if Myers looks good in camp, Gudas moving should be explored, since well have MacD,Folin, and Hagg for the bottom pair.
2nd work?
Stone is easily worth a 2nd.
He is probably worth a 3rd tops. Calgary would be better off keeping him until they are sure what they have in Andersson/Kylington/Fox.
Lol.
ah, sorry I misread. Pesce would fit very well, I'm sure the price would be prohibitiveI was talking about Pesce.
But he was an Oshawa General alongside Tavares..?
My opinion; The Leafs should be playoff bound, without making any further changes. Let the current players, and prospects grow this year, and see what we have. Zaitsev should rebound, we don't know what we have with Ozihganov, Carrick in limited usage, had great stats in the past, and we have to see how Liljegren develops over the year..... It's possible that we already have our answers. It might be best to keep the picks, so that we have a pipeline of ELC cost controlled type players, when our non-core need payment increases, that we can't afford.
Situations might change for other teams as the year goes by as well... maybe a Tanev becomes more available. Maybe Pesce does.....
At this point, the prices on players that might be marginally available, isn't going to drop. If such deals haven't been done by now... let's just drop the puck, and see what we've got.
As a kings fan we could use the cap space and restock our prospects pool If they can get a young 2/3 winger and a bunch of picks I would be ok trading Muzzin The kings have alot of young defense man coming that should be able to replace him. Its a win win to me.Why do the king's need these pieces if they just re signed Doughty and Kopitar to 10m and 11m deals in the past year.