Proposal: Hamonic/Hamilton type deal for the Leafs (1st/2nd/2nd)

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
13,317
31,803
Western PA
idk how you can possibly defend Don Waddell's decision making as Atlanta's GM

It’s not my intent to defend Waddell’s tenure in Atlanta. I’m not that much of a homer. I’ve only ever argued that he gets his deserved reputation as a GM for the wrong reason; it should not be a because of his activity as a trader, but that as a drafter. Atlanta ended being awful to mediocre during its run because they came into the league with nothing and did a horrid job of drafting outside of the obvious picks (Heatley, Kovalchuk.)


Atlanta Thrashers Draft History at hockeydb.com


There’s a reason why the lone Thrashers team that had success was Kovalchuk, Hossa and a bunch of players in their mid-30s. Waddell directly or indirectly hired the scouts that failed to the build the depth necessary to compete. He’s responsible for that.

His trading record doesn’t warrant dismissing him as an idiot and expecting him to trade Faulk to the Leafs for crap. He’s average in that regard. There’s some good (Kozlov, Savard), a lot of justifiable and one truly horrendous deal (Coburn.)
 

Thrasymachus

Registered User
Jul 1, 2018
5,214
6,708
It’s not my intent to defend Waddell’s tenure in Atlanta. I’m not that much of a homer. I’ve only ever argued that he gets his deserved reputation as a GM for the wrong reason; it should not be a because of his activity as a trader, but that as a drafter. Atlanta ended being awful to mediocre during its run because they came into the league with nothing and did a horrid job of drafting outside of the obvious picks (Heatley, Kovalchuk.)


Atlanta Thrashers Draft History at hockeydb.com


There’s a reason why the lone Thrashers team that had success was Kovalchuk, Hossa and a bunch of players in their mid-30s. Waddell directly or indirectly hired the scouts that failed to the build the depth necessary to compete. He’s responsible for that.

His trading record doesn’t warrant dismissing him as an idiot and expecting him to trade Faulk to the Leafs for crap. He’s average in that regard. There’s some good (Kozlov, Savard), a lot of justifiable and one truly horrendous deal (Coburn.)
Fair enough, this is an interesting interpretation
 

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
13,317
31,803
Western PA
Yeah I know. I just thought some Canes fan could chip in and get the discussion going.

Unless there's an unknown internal motivation at play, he won't be a Hamonic/Hamilton candidate. Kadri or Nylander would have to come back the other way to motivate the Canes to move him to Toronto. There's simply no way around quality for quality there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deam78

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
Yeah I know. I just thought some Canes fan could chip in and get the discussion going.
fair enough, I don't think we would give up what it would take to get Pesce though, even if it was a futures package it definitely includes Liljegren. I'd sit on what we have, get a bandaid guy like Tanev/Petry etc at the deadline for a futures package and look to develop the guy who is the real solution for the long term, hopefully that's Liljegren
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
17,852
13,313
Edmonton
The Leafs should go all in on Karlsson as a 1 year rental. His cap hit fits this season and there’s a chance that he signs long term since he likes living in Ottawa/Ontario. After this season a lot of players will be getting raises so they might as well go all in this year.
 

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
The Leafs should go all in on Karlsson as a 1 year rental. His cap hit fits this season and there’s a chance that he signs long term since he likes living in Ottawa/Ontario. After this season a lot of players will be getting raises so they might as well go all in this year.
statistically you're a lot more likely to win a cup by being a top 5 team for 5-7 years than being the best team for 1 year. I think what it costs to get Karlsson even as a rental probably knocks Toronto down a tier in the years after
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Man with a Plan

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
17,852
13,313
Edmonton
statistically you're a lot more likely to win a cup by being a top 5 team for 5-7 years than being the best team for 1 year. I think what it costs to get Karlsson even as a rental probably knocks Toronto down a tier in the years after

It will. The cost will probably destroy Toronto’s prospect pool for the next 2 seasons but it will be the closest thing to a super team that the league has seen in years.
 

Randy Randerson

Registered User
Jul 28, 2016
10,637
3,445
Hamilton
It will. The cost will probably destroy Toronto’s prospect pool for the next 2 seasons but it will be the closest thing to a super team that the league has seen in years.
honestly I'd be surprised if he could be had for exclusively non-roster assets. Even a super team has like a 5-to-1 chance of winning a cup though, I'd take 5-7 seasons of 10-to-1 instead, the Leafs are better off trying to sustain a good contender than go over the top imo
 

Revelation

Registered User
Aug 15, 2016
5,298
2,963
Connor Murphy, Justin Braun or Mark Pysyk would be the cost effective potentially home run guys. Ceci possibly as well but idk if he can be traded
 

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
Unless there's an unknown internal motivation at play, he won't be a Hamonic/Hamilton candidate. Kadri or Nylander would have to come back the other way to motivate the Canes to move him to Toronto. There's simply no way around quality for quality there.
Politely, no chance Faulk returns Kadri or Nylander. If that means he goes elsewhere...i'm A-OK with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Man with a Plan

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
78,784
86,115
Nova Scotia
I'd trade a 2nd rounder for Gudas in a heartbeat
Yeah I don't think Hextall would though.

Only RHD on the team. Only D with a mean streak, even though we all know he steps over the edge.

I expect he and Sanheim will be the middle pairing this coming year and it won't be util next summer when Gudas is possibly moved. But honestly, I would rather see:

Provy Ghost
Sanheim Gudas
Morin Myers
Hagg

...in 2019/20. Remove AMac instead of removing Gudas. That has a good balance of skill and size.


But FWIW, I am sure if any top 4 Dman comes available, especially a RH one, Dubas will be in on it. And honestly, even if he overpays by giving up extra picks/prospects, who cares. That's why he/they collected all the extra ones the past few years....to use when you need them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Man with a Plan

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
45,533
14,414
It’s not my intent to defend Waddell’s tenure in Atlanta. I’m not that much of a homer. I’ve only ever argued that he gets his deserved reputation as a GM for the wrong reason; it should not be a because of his activity as a trader, but that as a drafter. Atlanta ended being awful to mediocre during its run because they came into the league with nothing and did a horrid job of drafting outside of the obvious picks (Heatley, Kovalchuk.)


Atlanta Thrashers Draft History at hockeydb.com


There’s a reason why the lone Thrashers team that had success was Kovalchuk, Hossa and a bunch of players in their mid-30s. Waddell directly or indirectly hired the scouts that failed to the build the depth necessary to compete. He’s responsible for that.

His trading record doesn’t warrant dismissing him as an idiot and expecting him to trade Faulk to the Leafs for crap. He’s average in that regard. There’s some good (Kozlov, Savard), a lot of justifiable and one truly horrendous deal (Coburn.)

I think you misunderstood, It's not exactly that I expect him to trade Faulk to the Leafs for crap, it's more that I expect him to trade Faulk for crap period.

I do think he's likely he ends in Toronto eventually but no matter where he goes you won't get much back
 

Nolan11

Registered User
Mar 5, 2013
3,236
334
No to Braun for sandin +2nd or bracco + 1st , Yes to Gudas for 3rd pairing not 2nd pairing.
understood. You don't want Braun but lifer does. One vote for and one against. Consensus for sharks boards seems to be an OK to trading Braun for a 1st plus Bracco + 7th SJ 2020 just cause. We'd hope for a second trade to fill that hole but would do it to replace our lost 1st in the Kane deal
 
  • Like
Reactions: Liferleafer

ER89

Registered User
Jul 25, 2018
4,514
4,459
Yeah I don't think Hextall would though.

Only RHD on the team. Only D with a mean streak, even though we all know he steps over the edge.

I expect he and Sanheim will be the middle pairing this coming year and it won't be util next summer when Gudas is possibly moved. But honestly, I would rather see:

Provy Ghost
Sanheim Gudas
Morin Myers
Hagg

...in 2019/20. Remove AMac instead of removing Gudas. That has a good balance of skill and size.


But FWIW, I am sure if any top 4 Dman comes available, especially a RH one, Dubas will be in on it. And honestly, even if he overpays by giving up extra picks/prospects, who cares. That's why he/they collected all the extra ones the past few years....to use when you need them.
Hey one of your flyers brethren said he can behad for asecond. No takesies backsies. Hands off, he is ours now ;)
 

greasysnapper

Registered User
Apr 6, 2018
2,588
1,694
I feel like Hjalmarsson would be a good fit.

RHD, Top 4 quality, Cup experience, 4.1AAV this year, 5 the next 2. What makes this trade likely is it's a Western team (which Eastern team is going to want to set Toronto up to be a juggernaut), Chayka's always wheeling an dealing, and the Coyotes are building a young core.

I could see something like Sandin (Hayton's teammate) + 1st + Nielsen/Marincin/Rosen
 

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,378
9,688
Waterloo
understood. You don't want Braun but lifer does. One vote for and one against. Consensus for sharks boards seems to be an OK to trading Braun for a 1st plus Bracco + 7th SJ 2020 just cause. We'd hope for a second trade to fill that hole but would do it to replace our lost 1st in the Kane deal
Another vote yes
 
  • Like
Reactions: Liferleafer

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
21,161
23,471
I feel like Hjalmarsson would be a good fit.

RHD, Top 4 quality, Cup experience, 4.1AAV this year, 5 the next 2. What makes this trade likely is it's a Western team (which Eastern team is going to want to set Toronto up to be a juggernaut), Chayka's always wheeling an dealing, and the Coyotes are building a young core.

I could see something like Sandin (Hayton's teammate) + 1st + Nielsen/Marincin/Rosen

I'm not opposed to the player, but I think you've overpayed. 1st + Nielsen/Marincin/Rosen should do, and is about what Phoenix paid to obtain him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->