hockeynorth
Registered User
- Aug 31, 2017
- 12,595
- 6,386
Confirm
If I'm gonna play the game, I prefer to do it realistically.lmao at arguing over a 1M cap hit increase in a fictional GM game
So you're not matching?If I'm gonna play the game, I prefer to do it realistically.
The guy arguing this approved Dubois at 3 x 5. Not exactly a shining example of consistency.
Everyone told him that one was badIf I'm gonna play the game, I prefer to do it realistically.
The guy arguing this approved Dubois at 3 x 5. Not exactly a shining example of consistency.
Dubois getting 3 x 5 is a load of hooey.If I'm gonna play the game, I prefer to do it realistically.
The guy arguing this approved Dubois at 3 x 5. Not exactly a shining example of consistency.
So are you matching?If I'm gonna play the game, I prefer to do it realistically.
The guy arguing this approved Dubois at 3 x 5. Not exactly a shining example of consistency.
Prorating production is how you end up with immovable contracts. There's a hell of a lot more that goes into negotiations than just a player's PPG average. More than what I'm bringing to the table as well.Dubois getting 3 x 5 is a load of hooey.
Mantha getting 5 x 6 is the absolute bare minimum. Get out of here with your "only 48 points" when it's all about prorating for healthy seasons in contract negotiations. If a player's injury, IR cap relief takes the pain away anyway.
Final offer was 3 x $6.5m, but the silly business prevails.
3 x 6.5 should’ve gone through imo, that’s just under the Tkachuk dealProrating production is how you end up with immovable contracts. There's a hell of a lot more that goes into negotiations than just a player's PPG average. More than what I'm bringing to the table as well.
As for your 5 x $6m, it's pretty much dead on what was first offered. And that contract was based on Larkin's deal that he signed coming off of a 63 point season.
Final offer was 3 x $6.5m, but the silly business prevails.
You end up with immovable contracts when players fall off a cliff due to age (e.g. Ladd, Lucic) or get into that always injured but not injured enough zone where you can't LTIR them forever.Prorating production is how you end up with immovable contracts. There's a hell of a lot more that goes into negotiations than just a player's PPG average. More than what I'm bringing to the table as well.
As for your 5 x $6m, it's pretty much dead on what was first offered. And that contract was based on Larkin's deal that he signed coming off of a 63 point season.
Final offer was 3 x $6.5m, but the silly business prevails.
^^^^^^^^^According to @SJSharks39 Mantha's ask is $6.8m on a four year term. His career high in points is 48.
Was kinda hoping this game would be realistic.
Not matching Fabbri. Happy to accept CGY's 2nd, which looks poised to be a very early round pick in the 2021 draft.So are you matching?
I look forward to him signing his extension this summer. More likely than not his AAV will start with a five.You end up with immovable contracts when players fall off a cliff due to age (e.g. Ladd, Lucic) or get into that always injured but not injured enough zone where you can't LTIR them forever.
Whatever planet you're on where you can start an argument by saying that Mantha doesn't deserve anything around of 6.8m due to injuries is the unrealistic planet.
Hawks confirm. We thank Patrick Kane for his years of service and wish him the best in Dallas.Big trade!
Roope Hintz
Denis Gurianov
Jake Oettinger
Jason Robertson
2021 2nd
2022 1st
2022 2nd
2023 1st
Patrick Kane @ 50%
Sacrificing the teams future, and was very hard to give up Hintz and Gury, but adding Kane will help this team become a top contender in the west
@flyersdad