It’s not about the position of the team. It’s about the player.
If at some point down the road Patrice Bergeron has little value to the team (for whatever the reason) and we are offered a deal at the deadline, of course you consider it. It would be silly to do otherwise.
It’s hard for me to see such a thing happening any time soon, but I guess I’ll at least provide you that answer to the question.
Was that supposed to be some show stopper of a question?
As I said , I totally agree with the notion of not being unconditionally loyal.. It's a business and must treat as such.
The question is though how long does one hang on.. A.gm.must be able to assess his team realistically...
Before I continue , I still don't understand why you had to defend DK during his Prime years.
Key player in his prime... He has slowed but still an asset. As I said if we trade him , the player has to be an upgrade not just afill in
Back to trading players even our most " worshipped" ones . Well it's like sort of selling a stock...you wait too long you may not get good value or any value at all.
It's about making key moves and at the right time.
When chia traded Seg ..I wanted to shoot him...I still do.. At the time of the announcement I mentioned how disastrous this trade was and how destructive it would be for years to come.
Our roster would definitely be one to be much more wreckoned with
If Tyler was still here. A team cannot make horrible historical trades like that and expect to simply move on ..That trade may be very well be a cause of a shorter time frame for rebuilding the team and that as you know is not a short process