rumman
Registered User
- Sep 10, 2008
- 13,567
- 9,724
it's a shame he can't stay healthy, but if he could he wouldn't be on the trading block.
it's a shame he can't stay healthy, but if he could he wouldn't be on the trading block.
And replace him with who exactly
And replace him with who exactly
Trade:
Karlsson, Faulk, Pysyk, Demers, Hjalmarsson, Hamilton, Ristolainen, C. Miller, Tanev, Trouba.
UFA:
Carlson, De Haan, Green, Hamhuis, Franson, C. Wideman, Pateryn.
Internal:
Carrick, Borgman, Rosen, Liljegren, Ozghanov(sp?), Marincin.
Not like we can't replace a guy who was a net negative last season.
who cares? 6 years off the books
No one internally steps in and replaces him. No one besides Carlson is a better option than him and he’s going to be way too expensive considering we would need to replace two holes. The trades are all dependent on what we have to move. If we can move 10+25 for one of those guys (and a small plus) then I’d be cool with the move but I doubt that’s goin
Matt Martin is a Lou signing, and he was from NYI.
Unless Lou was stupid and got smart, maybe they call him home.
Say a conditional 7th. in 2020?
Kadri is a 30 goal scoring, 200 ft centre, that has a nasty side to him and is on an incredibly cap friendly contract. I don’t see any scenario that would strengthen the leafs by trading Kadri and putting Nylander in the middle. If Tavares doesn’t sign here then yes put Nylander as the 3rd line centre but if he does then Nylander would be my trade bait for a top pairing RD. The leafs are going to be tight against the cap and could never replace what Kadri brings for the $4.5 in my opinion.
And replace him with who exactly
from what some flames fans say, Hamilton is a soft offensive dman is that really worth giving nylander for? I don't think so. 6'6" doesn't automatically mean good at using his body etc. If he is just a tall version of gardiner im sorry but nylander doesnt move for that
If Nylander turns into a 70-80+ point player the balance defiantly tips to him in terms of value. Especially when taking into account their age gap.
I personally wouldn’t have much interest in trading Kadri, but more so don’t have any in moving Nylander. Fortunately I think the Leafs will solve their D issues without trading either
I like Hamilton but he’s not going to solve the team’s defensive issues. And they don’t need his main strength - Rielly and Gardiner can provide plenty of offense from the back end
Crazy how Nylander’s name keeps popping up in trade propsals as if he was a 2nd round pick or something
Not that I don't disagree with most of your post, I do disagree that Hamilton "isn't going to solve the team's defensive issues".
I'm sure a lot of it has to do with how good Giordano is, but the guy is legit plus defensively two years in a row, and could be Rielly's perfect compliment. As we've seen, he's done a lot the last couple years in brutal comp with a partner that can barely hold a hockey stick. Now imagine a guy who's playing in the comp we're talking about, and has come out plus two years in a row:
2017-18
toiQOC: 29.41 (hard 1st pairing comp)
DZS: 46.9%
rel.CA/60: -4.54
2016-17
toiQOC - 29.16 (Weak 1st/Tough 2nd)
DZS: 52.3%
rel.CA/60: -1.65
I mean he's not Hampus Lindholm defenseively, but he's a plus defender and great offensively. He'd be a real get for us to help move Hainsey/Zaitsev-Carrick down in the lineup going forward.
If they're asking for Nylander though, I'm out.
The thing about trying to help Calgary cap wise is they don't look like they need any help in that department. It seems they have a ton of older guys coming off the books and have about 12m in cap space currently. (That's at 75m cap limit still)One way we could get Hamilton without having to give up Nylander or even a lot of picks/futures is to take back Brouwer..... I hear Robidas Island has a spot open next season.
If Chia came calling and said "Kyle, I'm willing to trade 10th OA for a top-4 defenseman". Would you:
A) Trade Rielly (lol)
B) Trade Dermott
C) Trade Gardiner
D) Trade Zaitsev
E) Trade Liljegren
You can pick more than one (all 1 for 1 trades though), and this happens before Dahlin is picked so you don't know who is available.
Would you do Klefbom + 10th for Rielly?
Would you do Klefbom + 10th for Rielly?
The thing about trying to help Calgary cap wise is they don't look like they need any help in that department. It seems they have a ton of older guys coming off the books and have about 12m in cap space currently. (That's at 75m cap limit still)
If Chia came calling and said "Kyle, I'm willing to trade 10th OA for a top-4 defenseman". Would you:
A) Trade Rielly (lol)
B) Trade Dermott
C) Trade Gardiner
D) Trade Zaitsev
E) Trade Liljegren
You can pick more than one (all 1 for 1 trades though), and this happens before Dahlin is picked so you don't know who is available.
If you're asking me last off-season I would have said yes. Now? Absolutely not.
If Rielly continues this trajectory, he's a top-10 defenseman in the NHL next season.
I have the same feeling. But at the same time, I think Rielly is loved by GMs around the league and Dubas could probably force someone to really overpay if he decided to trade Rielly.
I remember reading that Bergevin complained that PK Subban wasn't more like Rielly.
And replace him with who exactly
I'd be very interested in trading Zaitsev for Edmonton's first rounder. Im not overly high on Zaitsev like some around here though.