Draisaitl vs. Matthews

Who will score more goals this season?


  • Total voters
    655
Status
Not open for further replies.

BertMcDrai

Middle old guy loving sports
Nov 26, 2018
788
891
Feel free to post 5v5 stats. I have many times and it still paints an ugly picture.

Okay I have watched Even Strength (while both on/off the ice)...and BÄM...Leon was slightly better without McD than McD without Leon...that means according your logic McD is trash...good lord...thats crazy.

Drai 1,88P/60 without McD
McD 1,87P/60 without Leon
 

joe dirte

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
9,430
3,559
I think we're starting to see that this thread is full of people jumping the gun on a hot start....
 

Oilers Propagandist

Relax junior, it’s just a post.
Aug 27, 2016
8,064
5,995
Edmonton, AB

explore

I was wrong about Don Granato and TNT
Jun 28, 2011
3,752
3,434
The McDavid factor is hard to ignore, but so is Matthews natural goal-scoring ability.

I think AM will score more goals if he plays the entire season, otherwise it's Draisaitl.
 

Vide

Registered User
Mar 2, 2015
641
111
Matthews will probably score more goals, but Draisaitl is the better player.
 

The Winter Soldier

Registered User
Apr 4, 2011
70,855
21,138
Drasaitl another 2 goals last night. Up to 12 on the year to co lead the NHL in goals tied with Pastrnak. He does it all. What a player.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
20,347
15,463
Matthews had one of the worst 5v5 GA60 stats last year for fwds.
5v5 GA/60 (16/17-18/19):

Matthews: 2.60
Draisaitl: 3.03

But yeah, cherry pick his one outlier year where he played with two rookies. Put him right around noted horrible defensive players McDavid, Couture, Connor, Eichel, Couturier, Draisaitl, Barkov... I mean, not everybody can be the best defensive player ever, David Backes, right?

Maybe we could look at the year before, where he was significantly better than Kopitar, Toews, Couturier, Barkov, etc.

Or maybe 5v5 GA/60 (especially in one isolated season) doesn't tell the whole story about defensive ability...
 

SENSible67

Registered User
Oct 31, 2019
40
17
Surprising result. Draisaitl plays like 5 minutes more a game, gets McDavid and scores at a lower per 60 rate (I think). If you are asking who will score more probably Draisaitl this year, but Matthews is probably better. I think about the age gap and I don't think this stays a debate much longer. Draisaitl has probably peaked. Moustache boy probably hasn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dion TheFluff

Soliloquy of a Dogge

I love you, Boots
Aug 8, 2012
40,873
5,512
San Diego, CA
Surprising result. Draisaitl plays like 5 minutes more a game, gets McDavid and scores at a lower per 60 rate (I think). If you are asking who will score more probably Draisaitl this year, but Matthews is probably better. I think about the age gap and I don't think this stays a debate much longer. Draisaitl has probably peaked. Moustache boy probably hasn't.

A few points;

1) Ice time and increased production isn't a linear equation.
2) If you lack the conditioning and ability to play 24 minutes a night like Matthews, you are not going to be effective in those minutes.
3) The age gap between them is inconsequential.
4) Draisaitl's progression curve has been trending upwards each season whereas Matthews' seems to have pleateaued.
5) If Draisaitl peaks as a 50-55 goal, 50-55 assist - 110 point player, it will still be better than Matthews' extreme top end which looks to be projecting towards a 55g 45a player in a lucky career year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snipes

snipes

How cold? I’m ice cold.
Dec 28, 2015
55,194
62,286
A few points;

1) Ice time and increased production isn't a linear equation.
2) If you lack the conditioning and ability to play 24 minutes a night like Matthews, you are not going to be effective in those minutes.
3) The age gap between them is inconsequential.
4) Draisaitl's progression curve has been trending upwards each season whereas Matthews' seems to have pleateaued.
5) If Draisaitl peaks as a 50-55 goal, 50-55 assist - 110 point player, it will still be better than Matthews' extreme top end which looks to be projecting towards a 55g 45a player in a lucky career year.

Respecting point number 1, we debated at length last year this with Lightning fans.

The case study to look at for “production doesn’t increase linearly with more ice time” is Kucherov. Analyze his game splits from last season.

Under 22 mins - approx 1.5 ppg (I think it might have been much higher this is off the top of my head without going back)
Over 22 mins - approx 1.0 ppg.

So not only did it not increase linearly with more ice time, it actually decreased when he played heavier minutes.
 

Eat The Rich

Registered User
Jun 17, 2017
1,487
1,673
A few points;

1) Ice time and increased production isn't a linear equation.
2) If you lack the conditioning and ability to play 24 minutes a night like Matthews, you are not going to be effective in those minutes.
3) The age gap between them is inconsequential.
4) Draisaitl's progression curve has been trending upwards each season whereas Matthews' seems to have pleateaued.
5) If Draisaitl peaks as a 50-55 goal, 50-55 assist - 110 point player, it will still be better than Matthews' extreme top end which looks to be projecting towards a 55g 45a player in a lucky career year.

That's not a conditioning issue.. That's a Mike Babcock issue. He won't give him the ice time that Draisaitl gets.
 

CantHaveTkachev

Legends
Nov 30, 2004
50,274
30,592
St. OILbert, AB
Surprising result. Draisaitl plays like 5 minutes more a game, gets McDavid and scores at a lower per 60 rate (I think). If you are asking who will score more probably Draisaitl this year, but Matthews is probably better. I think about the age gap and I don't think this stays a debate much longer. Draisaitl has probably peaked. Moustache boy probably hasn't.
because Matthews plays with scrubs? lol

Draisaitl does it all...scores goals, gets assists
and no, Drai hasn't peaked lmao
 

Soliloquy of a Dogge

I love you, Boots
Aug 8, 2012
40,873
5,512
San Diego, CA
Respecting point number 1, we debated at length last year this with Lightning fans.

The case study to look at for “production doesn’t increase linearly with more ice time” is Kucherov. Analyze his game splits from last season.

Under 22 mins - approx 1.5 ppg (I think it might have been much higher this is off the top of my head without going back)
Over 22 mins - approx 1.0 ppg.

So not only did it not increase linearly with more ice time, it actually decreased when he played heavier minutes.
I remember the discussion around that. I think most players, McDavid included, produce at a higher rate at or under that 22 min mark than they do above it. At some point, for most players, the increased ice time leads to diminishing returns.

McDavid has perhaps the best conditioning and recharge rate I've ever seen in an NHL player and has a unique ability to be able to play those minutes effectively however. Expecting Matthews to be able to do the same isn't realistic. And Draisaitl is on the penalty kill 2-4 minutes every night as well; something Matthews, by his own accord, doesn't have any interest in doing.
 

Soliloquy of a Dogge

I love you, Boots
Aug 8, 2012
40,873
5,512
San Diego, CA
That's not a conditioning issue.. That's a Mike Babcock issue. He won't give him the ice time that Draisaitl gets.
He's getting right around 20 mins a night which seems to be a sweet spot for him in terms of productivity, nothing wrong with that.

If he played on the PK he'd probably be around 22 minutes a night but he doesn't.
 

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
13,401
12,795
Long Island
Cause he can't handle it or because he's a defensive liability out there, take your pick.

Uh, no. Because Babcock believes more in rolling the lines than going with a top heavy approach. It's the same for Marner and Tavares. They don't play McDavid/MacKinnon/Schiefele level minutes because he doesn't want them to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Finland vs Norway
    Finland vs Norway
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $300.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Slovakia vs USA
    Slovakia vs USA
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $150.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Lecce vs Udinese
    Lecce vs Udinese
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $50.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Czechia vs Switzerland
    Czechia vs Switzerland
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $875.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Sweden vs Germany
    Sweden vs Germany
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad