Whats ****ed up about this is that we could have waived him and KEPT De La Rose. Further mismanagement from the usual suspects. Another fail in a long long line of fails.
DLR can play wing on the 4th line, so he has nothing to do with Domi, Danault, Kotka. As for Poehling and Suzuki, we'll see what they do next year, but so far they aren't on the team and who knows what other moves would be made between now and next year.
Vejdemo isn't close to being as good as DLR was in the AHL at least so far. Evans maybe, but we'll have to see how much he can progress between now and next year. DLR was on pace for 18 pts last year once given a chance, he was on pace for 38 pts in his last AHL season, the only one where they actually left him alone for any length of time before calling him up right as he started putting together a string of good games only to send him back and have him start all over again.
That's just terrible development and poor asset management. Putting players on waivers is fine but not when they are 23 and have some upside on a team that is a non playoff team again and should be adding youth not giving it away for free.
It is poor asset management when you give away a player for free, I know some people go out of their way to protect management but I don't know how anyone can look at this and not think it's poor asset management even if DLR doesn't do anything in the NHL, we gave him away and then put Pleks on IR and then waived him. Sounds like someone with no plan or clue what they are doing. If you are going to waive Pleks, do it 2 days before putting DLR on waivers. It wouldn't hurt at all to have DLR as a spare forward to replace DLO or Shaw if they get injured or don't play well.
I don't agree that Peca has a better defensive game, but to me it's not about Peca, it's about giving away DLR for free and then turning around and waiving Pleks when all they had to do was do this move sooner and DLR would still be here. Even if DLR did nothing the rest of the season, would rather have him around then give him away for nothing only to then get rid of the player that cost us from keeping DLR.
And then you get to moan about bargain bergy. Love it. Cake and eat it too. I get it.
Blah blah blah - DLR is gone. No loss at all and hardly poor asset management.
Why is everyone panicking about losing someone that wasn't even 0.5 ppg in the AHL. De La Rose is a dime a dozen player and Peca is so much better than him.
Yeah those idiots in Detroit will probably have him participate in shooting drills rather than practice bearhugs on tackling dummies.
I know - its crazy, like 17+ pages of complaining because Will Bitten was traded - lol. Remember most of these people lost the head when 27 was traded and basically called Domi a plug, and surprise, now they all love him. It's just a typical section of the fanbase overreacting.
Forcing OT goal against NYR in his last playoff series (sad that was his last playoff series, if we had a competent GM it wouldn't have been).
It was on a nice feed from Radulov. Should have seen many more of those.
OT goal to keep us in the series against the Caps...
"Plekanec, who led the Canadiens in points during the regular season, sizzles one by Theodore"
"Plekanec to Cammalleri" The sweet chemistry these two had...
"Plekanec on Thomas...Scores! A short-handed goal. Plekanec ties the game!"
He made a fortune playing hockey, can't feel sorry for him, his NHL career was over. Sayonara Turtleneck, very happy I don't have to watch you play anymore.
It’s like crying over the fact I dropped a nickel in the grass and can’t find it.Whats ****ed up about this is that we could have waived him and KEPT De La Rose. Further mismanagement from the usual suspects. Another fail in a long long line of fails.
That’s not nice.....guy was good for Montreal for many years. He got old in his field and slowed down, just like all of us will at some point.He made a fortune playing hockey, can't feel sorry for him, his NHL career was over. Sayonara Turtleneck, very happy I don't have to watch you play anymore.
Waiting for De La Rose to show the world how it was a mistake to waive him.Whats ****ed up about this is that we could have waived him and KEPT De La Rose. Further mismanagement from the usual suspects. Another fail in a long long line of fails.
Waiting for De La Rose to show the world how it was a mistake to waive him.
Waiting for 15 goal seasons to highlight the mismanagement of this player.
My bet is Peca will outscore him...easily
We must be among the worst teams in drafting Swedes.
There are lots of top Swedish players, and we havent drafted one since Mats Naslund. What's up with that?
This is suspiciously looking like MB simply signed him to play out his 1000th game in Montreal.
Ya, good pointI'll respond to this post in the DLR thread as I don't want to stray too far away from Plekanec unless of course, Plekanec is being argued as the reason why DLR got waived.
With Kotka sticking around and the team generally playing well this is not surprising. Don't see any takers at 3.5m but he will remain an option for us if someone gets hurt.
Yeah - you and others would lose their head if MB picked up a similar guy.
So bergy didnt want to give and extra 4 million on 4 years to Radulov but he gave 2.25 million for less then 10 games for plecky. Add the lost of JDL for nothing... and this guys still as a job......