NJDevs26
Once upon a time...
- Mar 21, 2007
- 67,538
- 31,967
He actually said they had an 86% chance of winning? Glad I used the 2nd intermission to take a dump.
I don’t understand why he’s say that because he of all people should know a hot goalie can really stand on his head. And I do really like his goalie analytics stuff.
But the game was dead even in both shots and goals after the 2nd period.
How the hell does he come up with 86% anyway? I could see 86% or higher if you’re up two goals with five minutes left, the NFL does that dopey ‘chance to win’ metric all the time. But what kind of metric would give the Rangers an 86% of a game that was a virtual coin flip?