Should have let McQuaid go last year, and once they signed him definitely should have let Miller go this year, then taken your lumps for one more year with Seidenberg, and bought him out next year (maybe the even has a nice start to the season and you can move him, best case scenario).
I wanted him moved, but this was the only option I didn't want them to use.
I agree with this.
Is this going to be a big difference maker in 2016-17? I doubt it.
This is a bridge year coming up and I'd be shocked if it were anything better no matter what DS does tomorrow or this summer. The only young difference maker is off the UFA market.
It would be great if this new cap relief lead to an offer sheet but um, whoops, those picks are gone for a rental journeyman and a failed experiment with trash.
The only good that may come of this is more youth being played night in and night out because of lesser number of veterans. To that end, I truly wish Kevan Miller was never signed. It would make this decision much easier to live with.
McQuaid could play his 62 games as the veteran voice and then head to Vegas. Chara's cap hit plummets next year and the Bruins are clear of any significant cap hits on defenseman over age 26.
I wish they at least waited a year. I guess they still think they are competitive. We'll see what they do this week but I can't see how they are going to get much better.
Maybe I'm clouded because I generally hate buyouts but this seemed like a good year to perhaps acquire some picks and prospects and pay some other team's cap problem for a year to get some assets in order to sell off Hayes and Seidenberg next summer. All while playing young players instead of those veterans for much of the year.
As of now it looks like Bruins are going to be paying Miller, Hayes and the ghost of Seidenberg a combined 6.16 million in 2017-18. Nearly 9m if McQuaid is still here. Yuck.
I hope this is the first in a "series of moves"