TheBuriedHab
Registered User
- Jan 27, 2010
- 8,107
- 3,731
No he doesn’t
Guess you started watching hockey this year.
Not in today's NHL.
Yes not in today's nhl, but somehow in last year's NHL he did. Yikes boys.
No he doesn’t
Not in today's NHL.
He is 7th in save percentage (.922)and 8th in goals against average (2.34) since Jan 1st 2019. I used min games played of 6 if you want to check yourself.
People seem pretty quick to forget how good he was the second half of last season. His start of this season is better than last season. I expect much of the same this year, much like I expect the same folks to come out of their caves after a bad game like today.
Edit: Gave up 2 or less in 25 of the 36 games to end last season. 3 or less in 29 of 36.
For years Habs management stopped building a team once they relyed on Price.Good stuff. People think Price is god for some reason because we are paying him as the undisputed best in the world. He is one of the best for sure IMO.
If Price played on contender with sound D, he would win cups for them. That's the difference a guy like this in net makes. Without Price and a average NHL goalie, Habs are in the bottom 10 somewhere
For years Habs management stopped building a team once they relyed on Price.
Like if they can keep mediocrity almost everywhere and still we can be cup contender with a better goalie. An obsolete concept if you ask me. We don't win cups anymore with a new Brodeur or Roy and nobody else. And the medias like rds or cogeco are also part of that "salesman's pitch" in favor of Price.
Last time Price was in the top ten for a whole season, not counting the year he was injured and only played 12 games, was his Vezina Year.
Here's where he finished: 2016-17 Gaa 23rd, save% 20th. 17/18, 64th and 70th. WOW.. 18/19, 17th and 20th. Right now? 31st in save % and 25th in Gaa. You can disguise it any way you want, those are not very good numbers for your highest paid player.
What makes Price vulnerable is when he's constantly on his knees. The shooting angle to the up are more reachable and the chances to score on him too. That's one of his bad habit since he became a pro. How is he still doing that...
Why not? He's done it before.You think Price can turn our team D into a top 10 or top 5 by himself?
8 yrs in, and a GM who rides a goalie towards another extension. It seems to be working for the GM, and the GM only. Sad...we have holes on D, and a GM who has not yet replaced a Markov, 3 years later.For years Habs management stopped building a team once they relyed on Price.
Like if they can keep mediocrity almost everywhere and still we can be cup contender with a better goalie. An obsolete concept if you ask me. We don't win cups anymore with a new Brodeur or Roy and nobody else. And the medias like rds or cogeco are also part of that "salesman's pitch" in favor of Price.
With this top 10 in 2016-17 how could you ever expect him to be in it. The top 4 goalies in save percentage have a combined 30 saves and 0 games started. The top 7 combined started 5 games and faced 171 shots.Last time Price was in the top ten for a whole season, not counting the year he was injured and only played 12 games, was his Vezina Year.
Here's where he finished: 2016-17 Gaa 23rd, save% 20th. 17/18, 64th and 70th. WOW.. 18/19, 17th and 20th. Right now? 31st in save % and 25th in Gaa. You can disguise it any way you want, those are not very good numbers for your highest paid player.
LOL and forget Charlie Lindgren? But you're right, that wasn't a fair list.With this top 10 in 2016-17 how could you ever expect him to be in it. The top 4 goalies in save percentage have a combined 30 saves and 0 games started. The top 7 combined started 5 games and faced 171 shots.
If you put a 10 games played minimum, which I think is fair to remove the not even full year back ups, he is then tied for 9th at .923. 5 games played minimum tied him for 11th. That has 5 backs up in the top 10.
All in all I wouldnt cast stones about disguising stuff when you are counting goalies who didnt even start games.
LOL and forget Charlie Lindgren? But you're right, that wasn't a fair list.
Go back, and look at the teams Roy had in front of him......hardly a fair comparison at all. The list that played in front of Roy has hall of famers on it......Price not so much...Price rarely wins a game by being outstanding.
He's very good on many nights.
But i would expect more from the top paid goalie in hockey.
Patrick roy was a spectacular goalie and won multiple cups.
I dont see that type of run in Price.
That's another matter altogether lol.People still complaining about Price’s salary even though the team has had tons of cap space for a couple of years?
Did you actually watch what Roy did in the playoffs?Go back, and look at the teams Roy had in front of him......hardly a fair comparison at all. The list that played in front of Roy has hall of famers on it......Price not so much...
Yes our defense is bad, but its still much better than TOML lolOur offense is good. We are playing well overall but there’s nowhere near the talent on the backend. And when guys make dumb plays it puts the goalie in a position to look bad.
No reason to have not improved the backend. If we did we’re probably in the playoffs this year. We’d definitely have made it last year.
As it is now it’s very tough for our backups to win and that’s despite us being able to score.
Price rarely wins a game by being outstanding.
He's very good on many nights.
But i would expect more from the top paid goalie in hockey.
Patrick roy was a spectacular goalie and won multiple cups.
I dont see that type of run in Price.
The fact we gave him $10M and he can only play 60 games is amazing. Imagine paying a #1D or #1C that money and they can only play 60 games.
I'm not blaming Price, as it makes sense for a goalie to avoid back-to-backs. In fact, I would just pay two 1B type goalies and play each 40 games.
But NHL GMs have to be the dumbest species on earth. Are they even capable of basic napkin math? How do you pay for a full season when you know the player you're signing shouldn't/can't play it?
Can you even just calculate the difference of a .920 sv% vs. a .910 sv% (which is league average) over the course of 60 games? It's 18 goals. Would you pay $10M for an 18 goal scorer?
If Price can EVEN GET TO .920, heN's stopping like 18, 20, 22 extra shots for **** sake. Do the math on a napkin. I can't believe how far in the stone age the NHL is.
In no way was i "beating on Price". Just stating the obvious.This is the problem with our fanbase summed up in one paragraph. Every goalie from here and into the future will be compared to Roy and former others when the product on this ice isn’t even close to what those goalies played behind. We have a rich history of goalies. Price is the first elite to not play behind a contender. Whether he ever does is completely reliant on what happens the next 6-7 years. Roy was also on another level. Beating on a guy because he can’t replicate Roy is ludicrous.