So we lost and Nash being injured is an excuse but we didn't lose anybody up front? Can't have it both ways.
If you think this offense even when healthy is going to win anything then I don't know what you were watching when the team was healthy. In the playoffs, teams will just focus on shutting down the first line and nobody else can score.
I think you lost me...
so lets try my side again... we powered through last years regular season fairly healthy... then added a couple rentals at deadline... almost caught tampa from like 30 points behind... went into playoffs but unfortunately had the crippling injuries hit our defense again...
knocked off Toronto spoiling close to 450 million dollars of taxpayer money they had already spent on their cup parade planning route
and then the team you probably think is the best in the nhl… beat us
so I think we are ok here. im not sure that I said we lost because rick nash got hurt. we had many more injuries then that. and im not even sure I said we would have won if healthy. in fact I think I have often said winning and losing at playoff time often comes down to one puck bounce in game 7.
of course its more likely that puck bounce goes in your favor if you got the better horses. nash was one of our better horses and he got hurt. carlo was hurt. I guess Bergeron and chara were hurt?
anyhow now we look at this years team and im guessing that's where you wanted to call me out? so I said this years team is better on paper then last year. that basically rick nash is the only lose. that basically getting him back would make us better than last year
is that what you are challenging? and if so... why? and how do you make that argument???
are you telling the rest of us halak isn't better than khubodin?
maybe you feel McAvoy/carlo have peaked and are on the decline? moore isn't better than McQuaid? gryz or krug have regressed? or is it chara? are you telling us our defense is worst? im not sure what argument you are trying to have with me. for the record... our defense is much better and deeper.
up front? are we unable to handle the loss of riley nash? tim schaller? are those the guys you are pointing to and saying we took a step back? do you feel david backes and danton Heinen are the reasons we are worst? or is it krecji?
I honestly don't know what your point is.
I will say that our kids have not stepped up their game over last year and have struggled... but that's not written in stone now. with a bit of help, I foresee a strong possibility they will have better second halfs. the 4th liners like Nordstrom and wagner are about the same as riley nash and schaller. maybe not having as good a year. but that's offset by the improvement in pastrnak.
honestly, if you get Bergeron healthy and add a guy like rick nash our forward group is roughly as good as last years.
they just know they are hurt and shallow at the moment... the kids are struggling with confidence... the team is focused on defense first... theres a negative momentum hurting us.
plenty of time to turn that around when we get our leaders back in the lineup second half and the turn around becomes even more easy if we add an impact guy for our top 6 to help