signjng him is dubas's fault
why was he. put there every game
wasmt scratched once but his play was sub par
it doesnt make sense
why was he. put there every game
wasmt scratched once but his play was sub par
it doesnt make sense
He did some good things, he did some bad things.Not pointing fingers at this player. His bail on some plays were nasty though.
Confidence makes a huge impact as do line chemestry.I'd say he lacked confidence.
I love how many critics feel the need to talk about his looks. Over and over again.That's because he was on the 3rd line playing vs scrubs...how much offense did he produce.
His entire game is stick handle the put in the zone down the wing, turn a few times and lay it off to the defence, when hes not turning it over. But he does this while looking pretty
That's because he was on the 3rd line playing vs scrubs...how much offense did he produce.
His entire game is stick handle the put in the zone down the wing, turn a few times and lay it off to the defence, when hes not turning it over. But he does this while looking pretty
If Nylander DOESNT go to the WHC, I will even more of whatever little faith I have left in him.
Kid just doesn't seem to want to compete.
what makes you think he'll rebound next year? He schooled Dubas into a inflated contract, I think there's just as much a chance he regresses next season as there is he plays up to his contract. Besides he's maore valuable a a trade chip to improve the D, his offensive prowess (when present) is expendable for help on the D.if we can get at 26 or younger RHD for nylander do it, if not build his value and then decide whether to keep him or trade him at his usual value.
What is your problem, dude?
I want Nylander to do well as much as the next guy...
what makes you think he'll rebound next year? He schooled Dubas into a inflated contract, I think there's just as much a chance he regresses next season as there is he plays up to his contract. Besides he's maore valuable a a trade chip to improve the D, his offensive prowess (when present) is expendable for help on the D.
Not if your making 7M on apparently a discountHe also played with the 2 worst forwards on our team. Kinda balances out tbh.
Not if your making 7M on apparently a discount
no where has anyone claimed it was a discount, a few have said its right on value and I personally think he is $250-500K overpaid. No one anywhere has said a discount
edit: you also seem to be implying that $7M should be able to turn brown and marleau into effective offensive players? Matthews wouldn't be able to score centering them. That line had one job only don't get scored on, they didn't do too bad at that job
Johansson (1 point) ... Coyle (4 points) ... Kuhlman (1 point)He also played with the 2 worst forwards on our team. Kinda balances out tbh.
His effort level is questionable, but he's too young and talented to give up on YET.
come on, many posters here continue with the "he got a fair contract" narrative all the time, maybe not you, but there are plenty who do. Not admitting this is just another Team Nylander bias, sorry the facts are ruining your narrative.no where has anyone claimed it was a discount, a few have said its right on value and I personally think he is $250-500K overpaid. No one anywhere has said a discount
edit: you also seem to be implying that $7M should be able to turn brown and marleau into effective offensive players? Matthews wouldn't be able to score centering them. That line had one job only don't get scored on, they didn't do too bad at that job
if we can get at 26 or younger RHD for nylander do it, if not build his value and then decide whether to keep him or trade him at his usual value.
come on, many posters here continue with the "he got a fair contract" narrative all the time, maybe not you, but there are plenty who do. Not admitting this is just another Team Nylander bias, sorry the facts are ruining your narrative.