Kind of off-topic, but can the cap go down? Is there any way they can do that?
Of course, they can do an ugly escrow next year...
they don't need to be cup contenders. But to miss the playoffs again? In a pretty weak division? Ugly.Arizona needs to sell tickets. This was a P.R. move more than a hockey move imo. They want to show their fans they are serious about winning. But I'm sure the GM and whoever their owner is know they aren't (And weren't) going to be legit cup contenders.
I said this for a year now. Not only can it go down, it will. There is no other way. Or a lockout. Cap was unsustainable already in that insane asset bubble created for 10 years. 1 normal correction and half of those teams will go belly up. When the distressed Devils were purchased, the attendance was bad. Nothing has changed much. Attendance is still the same if not worse, but the expenses almost doubled.
Cap of 2005 was $39,000,000. Today it should be: $51,500,000. It is: $81,500,000. Whoever set the cap, set NHL for a failure.
Believe it or not, since Hall last played for the Devils (December 10), the Devils are playing as the #1 Wildcard in the East at a 1.18 points per game pace.Hall was on an awful Devils team and a highly defensive Yotes team this year. In the right situation Hall will be an elite player again. Someone will back the truck up for him but it better not be the wrong team.
Arizona needs to sell tickets. This was a P.R. move more than a hockey move imo. They want to show their fans they are serious about winning. But I'm sure the GM and whoever their owner is know they aren't (And weren't) going to be legit cup contenders.
I said this for a year now. Not only can it go down, it will. There is no other way. Or a lockout. Cap was unsustainable already in that insane asset bubble created for 10 years. 1 normal correction and half of those teams will go belly up. When the distressed Devils were purchased, the attendance was bad. Nothing has changed much. Attendance is still the same if not worse, but the expenses almost doubled.
Cap of 2005 was $39,000,000. Today it should be: $51,500,000. It is: $81,500,000. Whoever set the cap, set NHL for a failure.
Devils before Hall trade were 10-17-5 and after 18-11-7. Go figure.Hall was on an awful Devils team and a highly defensive Yotes team this year. In the right situation Hall will be an elite player again. Someone will back the truck up for him but it better not be the wrong team.
Where is the rest of the money going and why should players not accept less?Didn't the union have to accept a pay-cut on already set contracts some years ago? Yeah, this will be ugly, if the league looses a billion dollar (made-up number) on the playoffs being cancelled.
In no way are Arizona, or Edmonton, or Jersey contenders.I think this effects Hall during free agency. He signs with a contender and then they turn into a basement team.
I mean if I was Hall, given his situation, I would take a three-year discount with the Tampa Bay Lightning.
But I see him signing a stupid deal from either Nashville, Columbus, Dallas, LA, or Philly.
With that being said, this could be the worst trade in Coyotes history.
Signing a "one year deal to bet on yourself and make bank after" is never a smart decision for any player. This is hockey, all it takes is one second and your career is either done or permanently damaged. If Hall's options were sign say a 7x7 deal or sign a 7x1 in the hope of signing 9-9.5x7 the year after the only smart play is to sign for seven years right away.
I think this effects Hall during free agency. He signs with a contender and then they turn into a basement team.
I mean if I was Hall, given his situation, I would take a three-year discount with the Tampa Bay Lightning.
But I see him signing a stupid deal from either Nashville, Columbus, Dallas, LA, or Philly.
With that being said, this could be the worst trade in Coyotes history.
Edmonton is definitely a contender. Perhaps not a front runner, but a contender nonetheless.In no way are Arizona, or Edmonton, or Jersey contenders.
idk about that. I view a contender as a team that either waltzs into the playoffs with little worry about missing them and/or is known to elevate a lot in the playoffs. Neither describes the Oilers right nowEdmonton is definitely a contender. Perhaps not a front runner, but a contender nonetheless.
Yeah it's called goaltending go being up the save percentages for their goalies before blackwood got his mojo going on.Devils before Hall trade were 10-17-5 and after 18-11-7. Go figure.
Not when Hall was with them, the reasoning is Hall turns teams from contenders to lousy being usedEdmonton is definitely a contender. Perhaps not a front runner, but a contender nonetheless.
Escrow fixes pretty much everything you complain about.
they don't need to be cup contenders. But to miss the playoffs again? In a pretty weak division? Ugly.
A playoff team with the two best players in the world? Like I said they're not strong contenders but would anyone be shocked if they win a round or three?idk about that. I view a contender as a team that either waltzs into the playoffs with little worry about missing them and/or is known to elevate a lot in the playoffs. Neither describes the Oilers right now
Hall had 2 goals his last 12 gamesNot due to Hall though. The rest of the team around him just shit the bed.
I guess I missed the context of that conversationNot when Hall was with them, the reasoning is Hall turns teams from contenders to lousy being used
Yeah it's called goaltending go being up the save percentages for their goalies before blackwood got his mojo going on.
Hall had 2 goals his last 12 games
he's most certainly a huge part of the blame