Lol. I'm sure the social media person would have a lot of ideas on how to improve the situation.Maybe they should focus more on winning hockey games. 24th in the league
If everybody in the video consented to being a part of the video and had no problem with what they saw, I have absolutely no problem with this. I can see why people are angry about this, given the recent outburst of workplace sexual harassment that we've seen, and the fact that the leader of the free world admitted to committing workplace sexual harassment regularly. I can also understand why people don't think it's okay to make light of something like this; people who have experienced workplace sexual harassment are seriously traumatized. Some have lost their job because they wouldn't have sex with their boss! It's not something to joke about at all.
I don't have a problem with Kesler or the Ducks doing this but the backlash is partially justified due to the prominence of workplace sexual harassment.
Not a big deal to me, but considering a lot of kids watch NHL and have access to social media you would think they would be a little more respectful.
I don't understand it. How does walking around naked celebrate 100 years?I’m mainly offended by what a dumb concept it was in the first place.
Well they already did, so I guess they disagree with you on that one.
I don't understand it. How does walking around naked celebrate 100 years?
It's even more hilarious that those sjws then protest by getting nude such as feminists do to protest "sex object" mentality. It is so hypocritical its hilarious.In fact it's usually only a minority who are very vocal on twitter exc. It's sad how a few whiny sjws have such a huge power since companies are scared of the backlash getting bigger.
Manson is certainly not ahead of Lindholm or Fowler. #3 on the Ducks at best.kinda above .500. if you consider 10 wins and 13 losses "above" .500.
also Manson is not one of the ducks top 3 dmen? I thought he was a #2 guy?
Nah he was offended that I referred to vatanen as our #3... which I suppose is fair... an argument could be made for either vatanen or manson as our #3Manson is certainly not ahead of Lindholm or Fowler. #3 on the Ducks at best.
the fake tweet thing was awful.. you mean they could find any funny real tweets about perry getzlaf or keslerI think the only reason why certain people "flipped out" over this silly, immature attempt at humor is due to what has been in the news of late with the Harvey Weinstein and Charlie Rose sexual harassment outings.
Clearly, that was not what was intended with this dumb joke, but the suggestive nature (which is what Charlie Rose apparently did, walking around naked in front of his female assistants), is what triggered the over-reactive types to think that the Ducks are tone deaf.
The Ducks also have the worst social media team in sports, so it isn't that surprising to see how inept they are.
Anaheim Ducks use fake mean Tweets in promo
Yeah, that's what I thought. I think it's a toss up as to who is the #3 between Vats and Manson. I'd personally say Vatanen, but I'm biased since he's my favourite Duck.Nah he was offended that I referred to vatanen as our #3... which I suppose is fair... an argument could be made for either vatanen or manson as our #3
the fake tweet thing was awful.. you mean they could find any funny real tweets about perry getzlaf or kesler
huh? They're only hypocrites because of your baseless assumption that they're the exact same people doing both.It's even more hilarious that those sjws then protest by getting nude such as feminists do to protest "sex object" mentality. It is so hypocritical its hilarious.
The whole thing was very cringe worthy... I wish wed just embrace our villain reputation.The funniest thing about that was that one of those "tweets" was 160 characters long, and the only real tweet that they used was from a team employee.
North American prudishness will probably never cease to amaze me.
I think the only reason why certain people "flipped out" over this silly, immature attempt at humor is due to what has been in the news of late with the Harvey Weinstein and Charlie Rose sexual harassment outings.
Clearly, that was not what was intended with this dumb joke, but the suggestive nature (which is what Charlie Rose apparently did, walking around naked in front of his female assistants), is what triggered the over-reactive types to think that the Ducks are tone deaf.
The Ducks also have the worst social media team in sports, so it isn't that surprising to see how inept they are.
Anaheim Ducks use fake mean Tweets in promo
Anaheim Ducks Use Fake Tweets on Social Media Night | The Royal Half
Your suggestion is to have him expose himself... in public... outside... in a park.... where children are? And that is somehow better than him walking around in the office with consenting adults because why? I guess I'll never understand the "logic" of triggered people.