tl;dr version: We had a bad SoS, were without our top defensemen, and our offense couldn't keep up with the playoff teams in our division for 32 games! We faced them 8 times each in a season. This season, we see Vegas only 4 times. It was a cluster-Duck last season for us.
Epic version: I was looking at our Strength of Schedule (SoS) for last season and it indicated we had one of the roughest schedules. All the CA teams had it rough in the West "Honda" division (we're the Honda division, right?) I couldn't find much for the 2019-20 SoS except for the remaining games of that season, where it had our SoS in the middle of the pack.
2019-20
Ducks | | | | | | | | |
Year | Type of Games | Games | W | L | OTL | 1G pts | | Win Pct |
2019-20 | Total | 71 | 29 | 33 | 9 | 67 | | 40.8% |
| 1-goal games | 33 | 15 | 9 | 9 | 39 | | 45.5% |
| Non 1-g games | 38 | 14 | 24 | 0 | 28 | | 36.8% |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Percentage of 1-goal games: 46.5%
2020-21
Ducks | | | | | | | | |
Year | Type of Games | Games | W | L | OTL | 1G pts | | Win Pct |
2020-21 | Total | 56 | 17 | 30 | 9 | 43 | | 30.4% |
| 1-goal games | 29 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 29 | | 34.5% |
| Non 1-g games | 27 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 14 | | 25.9% |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Percentage of 1-goal games: 51.8%
Although we were involved in more one-goal games in 2020-21, we just sucked, especially in games that weren't close.
Division Breakdown
Against non-playoff teams
Ducks | 2020-21 | | | | | | | | |
Opponents | GP | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | GF | GA | GD |
Arizona | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | | 17 | 25 | -8 |
LA | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | | 22 | 25 | -3 |
SJ | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 | | 22 | 20 | 2 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | 24 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 23 | | 61 | 70 | -9 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Pts/GP | | GF/GP | GA/GP | |
| | | | Average | 0.96 | | 2.54 | 2.92 | -0.38 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
This shows we're about a .500 team against similarly talented teams. Our win record against the non-playoff teams are 0.416 and point production is 0.958.
Against playoff teams
Ducks | 2020-21 | | | | | | | | |
Opponents | GP | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | GF | GA | GD |
Vegas | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | | 13 | 29 | -16 |
Colorado | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | | 19 | 30 | -11 |
Minny | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | | 14 | 24 | -10 |
St. Louis | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 6 | | 19 | 26 | -7 |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | 32 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 20 | | 65 | 109 | -44 |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Pts/GP | | GF/GP | GA/GP | GD/GP |
| | | | Average | 0.63 | | 2.03 | 3.41 | -1.38 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
This is where our offense and defense cannot keep up with these more talented teams. Our win record against the playoff teams are 0.218 and point production is 0.625. The silver lining is we faced each team 8 times last year. This year, we face Vegas 4 times and Edmonton 3 times. That reduces our chances of getting beat down as often!
- Manson played in 23 out of 56 games, or 41.1% of the time.
- Lindholm played in 18 out of 56 games, or 32.1% of the time.
A significant reason our defense drops is because we were missing both Manson and Lindholm for the majority of the season, who are our best defensemen.
Lindholm
2020-21 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
First 33 games | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Item | Games | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | GF | GA | GD | | GF/GP | GF/GP | GF/GP |
Total | 33 | 9 | 18 | 6 | 24 | . | 72 | 112 | -40 | | 2.18 | 3.39 | -1.21 |
W/o Lindholm | 15 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 9 | . | 37 | 64 | -27 | | 2.47 | 4.27 | -1.80 |
w/ Lindholm | 18 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 15 | . | 35 | 48 | -13 | | 1.94 | 2.67 | -0.72 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
These are all 18 games that Lindholm participated in for the season. The goal differential without Lindholm is staggering, especially when you consider there are three more games played with Lindholm on the ice.
Manson
2020-21 | | | | | | | | | |
First 33 games | | | | | | | | | |
Exclude Manson | return | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Item | Games | W | L | OTL | Pts | . | GF | GA | GD |
W/O Lindholm | 15 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 9 | . | 37 | 64 | -27 |
W/o L, M in | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | . | 14 | 14 | 0 |
No L + M | 11 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 4 | . | 23 | 50 | -27 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
We are down right abysmal without Lindholm and Manson in the lineup.
== Our offense ==
2019-20 Top-10 Duck scorers
2019-20 | | | | | |
Player | Games | G | A | Pts | PPG |
Henrique | 71 | 26 | 17 | 43 | 0.61 |
Rakell | 65 | 15 | 27 | 42 | 0.65 |
Getzlaf | 69 | 13 | 29 | 42 | 0.61 |
Silf | 66 | 21 | 18 | 39 | 0.59 |
Fowler | 59 | 9 | 20 | 29 | 0.49 |
Kase | 49 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 0.47 |
Steel | 65 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.34 |
Lindholm | 55 | 2 | 20 | 22 | 0.40 |
Grant | 49 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 0.41 |
Ritchie | 41 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 0.46 |
| | | | | |
| | | | Average | 0.50 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
We lost Kase and Ritchie at the trade deadline. It's a blow to our offense, but then again Kase being made out of glass is also a blow to our offense.
2020-21 Top-10 Ducks scorers
2020-21 | | | | | | |
Player | Games | G | A | Pts | PPG | PPG Diff 2019 for top-10 |
Comtois | 55 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 0.60 | NA |
Rakell | 52 | 9 | 19 | 28 | 0.54 | -0.11 |
Fowler | 56 | 5 | 18 | 23 | 0.41 | -0.08 |
Henrique | 45 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 0.47 | -0.14 |
Terry | 48 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.42 | NA |
Getzlaf | 48 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 0.35 | -0.25 |
Silf | 47 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 0.34 | -0.25 |
Grant | 46 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.33 | -0.08 |
Shattenkirk | 55 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 0.27 | NA |
Heinen | 43 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.33 | NA |
| | | | | | |
| | | | Average | 0.41 | -0.10 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
All the "NA" means they are new to the top-10. Across the board for the top-10 players on both sides, we see their production drop.
We're gonna rely on the growth of Comtois, Zegras, and Drysdale while hoping Silf and Rico go back to their scoring ways. I think going back to a normal schedule will help the whole team. As it, we're a bottom dwelling team due to our SoS in the strong West. With a normal distribution of games and being in a weak Pacific, the Ducks can look like a fringe playoff team, but unless some talent carries the offense for us this year without any more moves, the future doesn't look great. We might benefit from a weak schedule, but we're still a weak team.