Are you referring to the guy is on his third teamRyan O'Reilly is an above average 1C - and in the playoffs, he was elite.
The point of the conversation do you need elite centers
He was great last playoff but I wouldn’t call him elite
Are you referring to the guy is on his third teamRyan O'Reilly is an above average 1C - and in the playoffs, he was elite.
I appreciate that. I think all the trade day hype had me pumped that Sweeney would have realized by now what it takes to win a cup. Especially after seeing it first hand last year. We have needed that player for four years now. Kreider was out there. So were others. I much rather would have used the first rounder plus plus it would have took to overwhelm the Rangers,then worry about the money to sign Krug over the summer. Tells me winning it all may not be the main motivating factor under this management. I love Krug and want him signed. But lets cross that mountain when we get to it. Anyway point taken and thanks.Just a bit of friendly advice, ease back a bit on the definitive statements, if they are controversial.
1) Bobby Orr was one heck of hockey player, eh? -- You won't get grief for this, outside of people asking why you need to state the obvious. Definitive? Yes. Necessary? Not really. Likely to get you roasted? Nah, just some gentle nudging.
2) Outside of Carlo, Sweeney has not added one impactful player. Definitive? Yes. Necessary? I guess so if you want to get people going after you. Likely to get you roasted? People a little strung out post TDL. Lions might just see the hyena stroll by and say "tomorrow -- can't be bothered today".
I guess we'll see.
Defensemen usually take a bit longer so remember we are talking about a 23 year oldBrandon Carlo is not an impact player.
and to play devils advocate, Bruins were a bit lucky he was still there to pick.
Brandon Carlo is not an impact player.
and to play devils advocate, Bruins were a bit lucky he was still there to pick.
My bad he drafted Carlo. That makes two yes. Other then that he has not added an impact player. I am a new poster yes but i am not responsible for any other posters views.
Ryan O'Reilly is an above average 1C - and in the playoffs, he was elite.
Kind of always thought Sweeney gave out that contract with an eye on the expansion draft.
I get what you're saying, and I think a lot of people are disappointed that neither Kreider nor Palmeiri came through. I can imagine Sweeney is among that group.I appreciate that. I think all the trade day hype had me pumped that Sweeney would have realized by now what it takes to win a cup. Especially after seeing it first hand last year. We have needed that player for four years now. Kreider was out there. So were others. I much rather would have used the first rounder plus plus it would have took to overwhelm the Rangers,then worry about the money to sign Krug over the summer. Tells me winning it all may not be the main motivating factor under this management. I love Krug and want him signed. But lets cross that mountain when we get to it. Anyway point taken and thanks.
I get what you're saying, and I think a lot of people are disappointed that neither Kreider nor Palmeiri came through. I can imagine Sweeney is among that group.
However, Kreider didn't go anywhere. Colorado was in need and had the assets and oodles of Cap room, but didn't/couldn't do it. Boston needed to move Backes first to even have a shot -- and with that went our 1st rounder. Add to that Kreider was a UFA rental trade? Just not in the cards.
Can say the same for Palmeiri. If he went somewhere for a deal we could/should have beat? Fire away. But he didn't.
That's beautiful!!!!My favorite TDL post of all time was few years back. The poster was screaming about Sweeney not getting player XYZ, and was asked how was he supposed to get that player when he wouldn't fit under the cap. The poster replied, "How should I know? I'm not an NHL GM!"
That's the TDL in a nutshell right there.
NBC's Pierre McGuire joined Melnick in the Afternoon to recap all the deadline deals.
McGuire: Habs got outstanding return for Kovalchuk
I think you mean Washington for Kovalchuk.
Regardless, did Bergevin really take less to accommodate Kovalchuk????? If so, that's mind boggling -- for two reasons:
1) If Bergevin really wants to sign him as a UFA for next season he's an idiot. Montreal needs so much more than Kovalchuk at real money.
2) If #1 isn't true and Bergevin wasn't blowing kisses up Kovalchuk's ass to get him to re sign in July, then who gives a shit about what Kovalchuk wants. Has he really earned that much respect from Montreal in two months or whatever it's been?!?!?!
God I hope Montreal leaves Bergevin in place. I do miss the Habs being a factor just for the hate perspective, but I'm still happier with them being irrelevant than a danger. And Bergevin, IMO, guarantees that.
Either way, I'm glad Kovalchuk is not in Boston. I'll never know for sure, but in my book he's not a good fit for this team.
You work out a deal with Seattle so they don’t take the one you leave unprotected.So if they protect MacAvoy, Carlo and Krug . Who are you taking Moore or Lauzon? May have been the plan but it's flawed.
What Montreal fans want is one thing what the reality is something different, not you the Habs fans.Outstanding? Perhaps turning a waiver wire player into a 3rd but Kovalchuk bring back a 3rd is pretty much what I was expecting. Habs fans were sure he would get them a 2nd.
Ryan O'Reilly is an above average 1C - and in the playoffs, he was elite.
You work out a deal with Seattle so they don’t take the one you leave unprotected.
It depends how much you want the player. I always said it’s impossible outsmarting every GM .Just can’t win every deal but win mostSo now instead of losing one asset you lose two. It worked out real well for Vegas, I don't see that happening with Seattle.
It depends how much you want the player. I always said it’s impossible outsmarting every GM .Just can’t win every deal but win most
Thanks. That makes more sense. I thought we were spinning off into crazy land!Bergevin said he had a maybe offer from a team that Kovy didn't want to go to so he took the sure thing and let Kovy go where he was more willing to go. It's not what it's been made out to be. And there was no offer from the Bruins as per Kovy.
Are you referring to the guy is on his third team
The point of the conversation do you need elite centers
He was great last playoff but I wouldn’t call him elite
How is this (incorrect) statement relevant to the conversation you tagged? Original poster was stating the core is “aging”. I was pointing out that the core has expanded and doesn’t have one foot off a cliff.3 of whom he did not draft. This is still Chiarelli's team for the most part. Sweeney has never landed an impact player in a trade. 5 years now. Not one impact player. He has failed to fill the Lucic slot. Lets face it, Sweeney has done done a whole heck of a lot to win the cup since inheriting a Stanley cup nucleus.
How does Sweeney fit Kreider’s contract in without moving Backes, how does Backes move without the 1st? How does he acquire Kreider when he was resigned? Whiners. Be the first to complain if Sweeney had moved Studnicka Vaakaneinen Bjork + for Kreider and the Bruins bowed out in round 2 of the playoffs and Sweeney had no money to resign himI appreciate that. I think all the trade day hype had me pumped that Sweeney would have realized by now what it takes to win a cup. Especially after seeing it first hand last year. We have needed that player for four years now. Kreider was out there. So were others. I much rather would have used the first rounder plus plus it would have took to overwhelm the Rangers,then worry about the money to sign Krug over the summer. Tells me winning it all may not be the main motivating factor under this management. I love Krug and want him signed. But lets cross that mountain when we get to it. Anyway point taken and thanks.
Just so we know the ground rules here, what is your definition of "an impact player"?