Prairie Habs
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2010
- 11,972
- 12,395
I think the 2 on 2 play that didn't result in a goal might've been worse.
Its like Timbits hockey where its just a bunch of 5 year olds trying to chase the puck
I think the 2 on 2 play that didn't result in a goal might've been worse.
I said on the Oiler board that I expect that from a rookie forward coming back.Its like Timbits hockey where its just a bunch of 5 year olds trying to chase the puck
Yeah - the transaction pages say he has to go drive a taxi now.
Starting? This franchise has been cursed for decades and I say that as a closet Oilers fan.I’m starting to think that my precious Oilers have no idea what theyre doing.
I’m starting to think that my precious Oilers have no idea what theyre doing.
He can go directly to the Kings' taxi squad if the Kings were the only team to put a claim in.Back to the team he signed with originally i guess. Wonder if someone claims him again once the Kings try to get in on their taxi squad , again .
He can go directly to the Kings' taxi squad if the Kings were the only team to put a claim in.
He wasn't signed, previously.Don't they need him to replace Simmonds?
Thanks!He wasn't signed, previously.
The waivers means they signed him, likely as a taxi squad-injury replacement, so they don't have to call up a Marlies player so sit on taxi, right as they're trying to get AHL camps/games started
Eriksson on waivers with intention of him going to Utica!?!?