Frank JT
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2014
- 1,362
- 438
It is always L.A. because they have 2 firsts and a high 2nd. They have the currency to move up, it is that simple.
Ottawa: 19th, 32th and 44th
It is always L.A. because they have 2 firsts and a high 2nd. They have the currency to move up, it is that simple.
Are you suggesting the fact that they were on the same team actually changes their odds of success?
It's not so much the gap as that forwards are more predictable. You look at production and it gives you a pretty good idea. Goalies are voodoo, defencemen are not well evaluated at any level.I’m so torn on taking a D in the 1st. If we are convinced the guy is top 4 material, great, and my limited viewings of Seider, Heinola, York and Soderstrom do support that thought. But I’m seeing a lot of intriguing D ranked outside of the 1st:
- Korczak
- Johnson
- Kolyachonok
- Misyul
- Knyazev sp?
- Bolduc
- Johansson
- Ahac
- Zach Jones
- Spence
- Fairbrother
Don’t get me wrong, there’s a gap between those guys and the D ranked in the 1st. But I feel that gap is smaller than it is for the draft’s comparably-ranked forwards. Just something I’ve been mulling over...think I saw b1p mention something similar
It is always L.A. because they have 2 firsts and a high 2nd. They have the currency to move up, it is that simple.
Philly is really high on Boldy but with Knight being available at #11 i could see them finally getting there franchise goalie.......now with that being said, lets say Boldy drops to #15. If i was the GM of the habs i would call Fletcher up and make this offer.....
To Philly.....pick#15, Shaw and Byron
To Mtl....Gostisbehere, Ratcliffe
Just playing armchair GM.......can hardly wait for Friday night
McMichael had really bad comments by the scouts in the Black Book, probably the player who got picked apart the most.Lol at the Tomasino love while shrugging off McMichael. McMichael is a much better goalscorer than Tomasino. McMichael has better production when you account for team and his tools are just flat out more impressive.
Lol at the Tomasino love while shrugging off McMichael. McMichael is a much better goalscorer than Tomasino. McMichael has better production when you account for team and his tools are just flat out more impressive.
Tomasino is closer to Foudy than Hayton/Dellandrea in talent, McMichael is the kid that has the tools a la Dellandrea/Hayton and that upside. London had a terrible roster early on when McMichael was burning the league, then a lot of the big guns came back and it slowed him down, I have little doubt that he leads the league or is very near the league lead in points next year. Tomasino ? Not so much, and he was on, probably the best line in junior hockey with Robertson and Thomas.Nobody's saying McMicheal is bad, but Tomasino's skating is one of the best of the draft, and that makes him stand out in a big way. Its one of the main reasons he is systematically ranked above McMicheal, and he is my bet to be the Hayton/Dellandrea of that draft. I'm sure he'll be gone by 20, and probably sooner... He'll probably go really soon after Krebs as the next best C available in the draft.
It's not like London had a poor roster either, and McMicheal had plenty of icetime as the #1C for most of the year.
McMichael had really bad comments by the scouts in the Black Book, probably the player who got picked apart the most.
That last bit is just disingenuous, he spent most of the season playing up and down the lineup with a guy like Castleman. He also got very little powerplay time and made any line he was on instantly betterTomasino is closer to Foudy than Hayton/Dellandrea in talent, McMichael is the kid that has the tools a la Dellandrea/Hayton and that upside. London had a terrible roster early on when McMichael was burning the league, then a lot of the big guns came back and it slowed him down, I have little doubt that he leads the league or is very near the league lead in points next year. Tomasino ? Not so much, and he was on, probably the best line in junior hockey with Robertson and Thomas.
The MHL level is just as stacked though, best team in the league and all.
Love the 2nd round dislike the 15th rankA ranking by a guy who's opinion I value:
David St-Louis’s 2019 NHL Draft Rankings
Concerns about defensive IQ and play translating are the biggest knocks i've seenHarley don't turn 18 till Aug. Anybody actually watch him play live and know his game well? I didn't get a chance to watch him at the U18's
I don't think I've seen even one recent mock that doesn't have Turcotte going to the hawks. It seems like a foregone conclusion.Change my mind on Pod being taken by the Blackhawks. Didn't realize Turcotte was from Chicago. Pretty sure they take him now. Talented local boy
But personally, I like Pod a bit more.
I enjoyed his write-ups. I don't dislike the Tomasino ranking at 11, he always impressed me in my viewing and his ice time was limited considering a player of his talent.A ranking by a guy who's opinion I value:
David St-Louis’s 2019 NHL Draft Rankings
Concerns about defensive IQ and play translating are the biggest knocks i've seen
Oh really. Pretty young. That might change my mind on him a bit. I still really like broberg and heinola thoHarley don't turn 18 till Aug. Anybody actually watch him play live and know his game well? I didn't get a chance to watch him at the U18's
A lot. A lot of room for muscle gains. A lot of upside. Players his size with his skating, you don't see that often. He is smarter than Broberg.Thanks. I wonder how much more room he has to grow since he is one of the youngest in this draft? He did step up this year on his OHL team.
Oh really. Pretty young. That might change my mind on him a bit. I still really like broberg and heinola tho
A lot. A lot of room for muscle gains. A lot of upside. Players his size with his skating, you don't see that often. He is smarter than Broberg.
Same. Its as if Im living i a twilight zone. He seemed engaged and really fast, but they say hes slow and lazy ?Surprised at the engagement comments on McMichael. The impression I got, he played at good paces and applied pressure on defenders.
But coming directly from Edwards, I might have to do some last minute tape watching.
A lot. A lot of room for muscle gains. A lot of upside. Players his size with his skating, you don't see that often. He is smarter than Broberg.
I don't care about people assessment of Harley's defensive game since he is so young and it is what takes the more time to develop, he clearly has above average IQ, he will be big and fast when he reaches the NHL, I doubt people will say it is a weakness years from now, I don't see why it wouldn't be the opposite actually.