themelkman
Always Delivers
The only guy even close right now is Desimone. I haven’t seen Meloche at all but his stats aren’t inspiringso nobody playing D on the cuda is ever getting a chance?
The only guy even close right now is Desimone. I haven’t seen Meloche at all but his stats aren’t inspiringso nobody playing D on the cuda is ever getting a chance?
Burns and Karlsson both run a PP. There really isn’t room for another offensive defenseman in the line up. We need strong, stable 3rd pairing guys that aren’t gonna let in goals.
Merkley is trade bait right now.
The only guy even close right now is Desimone. I haven’t seen Meloche at all but his stats aren’t inspiring
Burns and Karlsson should be running the PP together...at the same time. Merks can QB the 20 seconds that the 2nd unit is going to get.Burns and Karlsson both run a PP. There really isn’t room for another offensive defenseman in the line up. We need strong, stable 3rd pairing guys that aren’t gonna let in goals.
Merkley is trade bait right now.
you can never have enough PMD in today’s NHL. If Merkley doesn’t make it because he’s not ready then so be it but to say he won’t or shouldn’t because he’s offensive minded when we have EK and Burns is not a good reason. It’s good to have balanced pairings. We saw what having two strong, physical defensive minded dmen on the same pairing did in 2016 vs Pittsburgh. Polak and Dillon couldn’t get the puck up ice and constantly turned it over. I can recall two goals off the top of my head.
Also, though I don’t like Deboer’s system he does have the offense run through his defense. Merkley when ready will be very effective.
I get what you are saying but let's also remember that the team made it to the Finals with those same physical defensive-minded dmen. Also, it wasn't their style of play that got exposed it was their lack of foot speed. Now I am all for balanced puck-move pairings but Merkley isn't just offensive-minded, at this point, he hasn't shown any ability to defend at the NHL level.
IMO Ferraro appears to have a good balance of defensive play with puck-moving. I doubt he will ever be an offensive threat but its completely fine if he can continue to move the puck up to the forwards effectively.
I get what you are saying but let's also remember that the team made it to the Finals with those same physical defensive-minded dmen. Also, it wasn't their style of play that got exposed it was their lack of foot speed. Now I am all for balanced puck-move pairings but Merkley isn't just offensive-minded, at this point, he hasn't shown any ability to defend at the NHL level.
That team made it there despite Dillon-Polak, not because of them. That pairing got absolutely massacred in the Final, and Thornton's line having to babysit them neutralized that line's effectiveness as well.
I'd say it's not inaccurate that that pairing did damage to the heavy teams trying to come out of the west, but they were exposed against the pens. Losing hertl meant that pairing couldn't push the play.
I dont know that in a vacuum having a pairing like that lost us the series but in combination As well as deboers reluctance to make a change.
Polak and Dillon were fine in terms of skating. They just fumbled the puck a lot and couldn’t get it out of the zone effectively. Also, Dillon nor Polak were positive contributors to that team making the finals. The first line, Couture, and special teams got them there.
You may be right about Merkley not being NHL ready by next year. I seriously doubt he would be unless he makes giant strides in the d-zone. I’d just prefer a PMD with Ferraro over some one like Prout.
I think id rather start moving Vlasic to the third next year and give Ferraro time with EK65Skating is the number reason Dmen can or cannot get out of the zone effectively. The better you are as a skater the more time you have and the more time you have the easier things get.
I still haven't seen enough of Prout to have any opinion of him but I think next season you could look to Ferraro to drive the 3rd pairing as long as he isn't paired with a complete anchor.
Well, they'll likely get a shot because I don't foresee both Heed and Prout staying beyond this year so there's a spot to be had there. But I don't see Merkley being ready next year and I don't see Roy or DeSimone playing to that level.
Ferraro was the one driving the Dillon-Ferraro pair imoI think id rather start moving Vlasic to the third next year and give Ferraro time with EK65
If we're looking at a right winger out of Los Angeles who's been a healthy scratch this season, the only player that I want is Tyler Toffoli. He's not the best scorer but he's got a heavy positive impact in terms of driving play which is a lot more than one can say for Kovalchuk. I wonder if something like Melker Karlsson and a 2nd for Toffoli at 50% would get the ball rolling.
The market looks thin for buyers, so I imagine that Toffoli could fetch quite a bit more.
Regarding Merkely...could he really be any worse than Tim Heed?
Regarding Dillon-Pollak, sure, they were awful in the finals, but they were excellent against St.Louis and Nashville. Variety is the key to success.
Yes, it is. A ligament repair like this heals in about 4 months. The rest of rehab is re-stregnthening the surrounding muscles and joint after the effects of the invasive surgery. One of the main reasons that the recovery time has dropped from over a year to 4 to 8 months is due to less invasive surgery techniques and better materials for the ligament (cadaver instead or own hamstring). At this point Simek could tear it again but it likely won't be because the ligament isn't healed, it'll be due to the knee doing something it shouldn't due to not being strong enough.The bolded isn't true (it's only been 8 months since the injury), but I generally agree with the rest. I'm hesitant to put a sophomore Ferraro in a permanent Top-4 slot, so ideally I'd prefer to go with Simek, Ferraro, and Dillon as the LDs next season. But Dillon is obviously easier to trade than Vlasic.
Polak and Dillon were fine in terms of skating. They just fumbled the puck a lot and couldn’t get it out of the zone effectively. Also, Dillon nor Polak were positive contributors to that team making the finals. The first line, Couture, and special teams got them there.
You may be right about Merkley not being NHL ready by next year. I seriously doubt he would be unless he makes giant strides in the d-zone. I’d just prefer a PMD with Ferraro over some one like Prout.
The bolded is definitely not the case. They were both pylons in the finals that year. Dillon has worked extensively on his skating to the point I don't even think it's close. They were exposed shift after shift as being too slow that year against the Pens.
I think people are under estimating the importance of size in the NHL. Not every defenseman has to be a behemoth, but if you look at that goal scored against Karlsson the other day, one has to wonder what an extra 20lbs may have accomplished.
There’s a reason the average NHL defenseman is an inch taller and 10lbs heavier than their forward counter parts.
If Karlsson was 20lbs heavier it'd probably be muscle mass in his legs and he'd actually be a lot stronger and faster (his agility might be affected though). It's not coincidental, bigger bodies in the back can handle the rigors of getting hit retrieving pucks better than lightweight bodies.And then when you make that case, you have to account how many speed races Karlsson will lose because he's carrying another 20lbs. The reason the average NHL d-men are bigger than the forwards is coincidental. There's no real purpose behind it.