Sjsharks5
Registered User
- Jan 3, 2019
- 149
- 97
I think id rather start moving Vlasic to the third next year and give Ferraro time with EK65
May work out, but IMO that still leaves the issue of having a driver on the 3rd pairing. I consider myself a “defender” of Vlasic relative to the opinion of most HF Sharks fans, but he definitely isn’t going to be a driver on any defensive pair. Even in his prime, Vlasic never thrived on moving the puck up and out of the defensive zone, let alone up the ice like EK65 does. Ferraro shows the poise, skating ability and intuition to move the puck up ice that could drive a pairing, even if Ferraro may not have shown a whole lot of upside in the offensive zone.
I admittedly haven’t watched a lot of Merkley tape, but my impression is that his biggest deficit isn’t attitude, but his lack of effort and ability in his own end. As much as I love Burns and EK65, I’m not naive; they both have significant moments of difficulty in their own zone. I personally don’t feel comfortable with adding Merkley to the lineup if he’s going to a liability in the d zone. Heed has his moments, but he hasn’t been a liability.I understand he’s not untouchable, but he’s also someone, like Hertl used to be, that has more value to us then on the market. Now unlike hertl who had lowered external value because of injuries hampering his production early in his career, Merkley has lower value due to his “attitude”.