Pettersen isn't going to shoot what he shot, and he doesn't have the high-end linemates to carry him when he's off. I'm not sure Keller is the right comparable. The season will always have ebs and flows. Its rare for a guy to stay hot for an entire year. Tkachuk isn't going to keep this up either.I have a feeling Pettersson might be this years Clayton Keller, strong start but cooling off a bit. Will someone else up the ante like Brock Boeser did last year until mid season when he slightly regressed. Or, will Brady continue to impress consistantly to take the Calder?
Subtlest of jabs at Brock Boeser hahaPettersen isn't going to shoot what he shot, and he doesn't have the high-end linemates to carry him when he's off. I'm not sure Keller is the right comparable. The season will always have ebs and flows. Its rare for a guy to stay hot for an entire year. Tkachuk isn't going to keep this up either.
I wasn't even thinking about Boeser. Because he hasn't had Boeser most of the year. Boeser could change that dynamic.Subtlest of jabs at Brock Boeser haha
You're not a fan yourself?
Its a 3 headed race at most because Pettersson and Tkachuk lead Dahlin, and Heiskanen is behind Dahlin. I watch the Stars fairly often, Heiskanen has been great stepping up with all the injuries, but you're not going to accidentally mistake him for Dahlin out there...
Pettersen isn't going to shoot what he shot, and he doesn't have the high-end linemates to carry him when he's off. I'm not sure Keller is the right comparable. The season will always have ebs and flows. Its rare for a guy to stay hot for an entire year. Tkachuk isn't going to keep this up either.
I hope you realize how ridiculous of a parameter this is. It's only useful for trying to attack the credibility of people who disagree with you. The only people who watch a majority of a given team's games are the fans of that team. So you're basically saying someone's opinion on Heiskanen is less credible if they're not a Dallas fan. No one buys that.In your eyes, what has Dahlin been better at exactly? Assuming you've watched the majority of Heiskanen's games so far. Which is unlikely but still.
Fancier? He's not fancier...that's more his reputation that anything I think. I can't imagine watching the two, walking away and thinking Dahlin is fancier.All I can think of is that he's a fancier and more physical on a better team. That's about it.
I hope you realize how ridiculous of a parameter this is. It's only useful for trying to attack the credibility of people who disagree with you. The only people who watch a majority of a given team's games are the fans of that team. So you're basically saying someone's opinion on Heiskanen is less credible if they're not a Dallas fan. No one buys that.
Fancier? He's not fancier...that's more his reputation that anything I think. I can't imagine watching the two, walking away and thinking Dahlin is fancier.
Breakout passing for one. Better at holding it in for two. Physical plays and winning battles. People think physicality and they think hits, but it's so much more and especially for a defenseman. He's a better passer on special teams, head-fake move he does all the time. Heiskanen is great at stepping up in the zone, he's faster so he carries it in himself a lot. He's got a great wrist shot. Heiskanen plays like a veteran with the puck on his stick, which I think has a soothing quality for his teammates. I like Heiskanen. But of course Dahlin can carry it up himself or step up in the zone too, you know that, you probably know him for that. Heiskanen is sexier, but Dahlin can do most of what Heiskanen do offensively and is just a more well-rounded player.
I've watched like 5 games, but I can't always watch the whole game, depends on when I get home. I also like watching different teams each night. You feel free to do you, but I'm not going to watch dozens of games on DVR just so that I can argue with people on HF.By fancy I mean dangling and things like that. Dahlin plays a very similar risky offensive game to John Klingberg. Also it's not ridiculous. If you haven't seen most of his games then you've maybe seen him play once or twice so it's not fair to judge just yet. I have managed to see all but 2 of Dahlin's games so far just for that reason. He's an outstanding player, but the gap isn't as big as people think. Heiskanen has the edge defensively right now despite Dahlin playing with a more physical style (Heiskanen himself admitted he needs to get stronger for board battles). Breakout passing I will agree with you though (Stars forwards are horrible at taking breakout passes though), and the Stars powerplay is just horrible but Miro is solid when he isn't with the first unit and married to passing to Seguin. As of right now, I don't see any reason Dahlin is more Calder worthy than Heiskanen though. The difference is minimal at most if at all
You need to watch Dallas games... Heiskanen has been every bit as good as Dahlin. Dahlin has a slight production edge right now but Miro has a slight defensive edge.You're not a fan yourself?
Its a 3 headed race at most because Pettersson and Tkachuk lead Dahlin, and Heiskanen is behind Dahlin. I watch the Stars fairly often, Heiskanen has been great stepping up with all the injuries, but you're not going to accidentally mistake him for Dahlin out there...
I hope you realize how ridiculous of a parameter this is. It's only useful for trying to attack the credibility of people who disagree with you. The only people who watch a majority of a given team's games are the fans of that team. So you're basically saying someone's opinion on Heiskanen is less credible if they're not a Dallas fan. No one buys that.
Fancier? He's not fancier...that's more his reputation that anything I think. I can't imagine watching the two, walking away and thinking Dahlin is fancier.
Breakout passing for one. Better at holding it in for two. Physical plays and winning battles. People think physicality and they think hits, but it's so much more and especially for a defenseman. He's a better passer on special teams, head-fake move he does all the time. Heiskanen is great at stepping up in the zone, he's faster so he carries it in himself a lot. He's got a great wrist shot. Heiskanen plays like a veteran with the puck on his stick, which I think has a soothing quality for his teammates. I like Heiskanen. But of course Dahlin can carry it up himself or step up in the zone too, you know that, you probably know him for that. Heiskanen is sexier, but Dahlin can do most of what Heiskanen do offensively and is just a more well-rounded player.
Pettersson, he's not danish.I see no reason why Tkachuk can't keep this up or something close to it. He plays the game a different way, he doesn't rely on teammates for points, he crashes nets, works in front of the goal and generates a lot of his own chances...of course he needs to be paired with some talent and as long as he maintains playing in the top 6, I think this will be a 2 horse race between him and Pettersen..
1. Tkachuk
2. Heiskanen
3. Dahlin
4. Pettersson
5. Cholowski
for me so far
If Boeser can stay healthy, EP should finish PPG. When he was out it was painful watching some of the lack of finish by his linemates.
If EP can finish PPG the Calder should be his.
1. Tkachuk
2. Heiskanen
3. Dahlin
4. Pettersson
5. Cholowski
for me so far