Classic Devil
Spirit of 1988
Done! I've always liked Gagne.LA Fans offering Gagne for Tallinder/Volchenkov. Would love it. Gagne seemed to be the odd man out in the practice today.
Done! I've always liked Gagne.LA Fans offering Gagne for Tallinder/Volchenkov. Would love it. Gagne seemed to be the odd man out in the practice today.
In regards to Matteau and the possibility of him sticking for the season... I want to bring up an NHL comparable who we've referred to when we've talked about his development; Lucic.
Looking at Lucic's stats, I'm seeing he played on the Bruins NHL squad right out of juniors. At age 19, having been drafted at #50.
Just wanted to mention that as food for thought, because if Matteau actually does stick for more than five games, it'll mean he's been consistently helping the team win, improving each game and that the coaching staff believes it's best for his development to play with the NHL club. (In my opinion anyways)
It's less rare than people think, prospects that young and drafted later making their case to stay with the big club when they get their chance. I'd be really excited to see Matteau stay with the Devils if his good play remains consistent and his development won't be stunted.
Done! I've always liked Gagne.
Done! I've always liked Gagne.
Lucic went back to juniors the year after he was drafted (second year post-draft) and joined the Bruins as a 19 year old. Matteau would be making the team as an 18 year old in his first year post-draft.
What the Devils have to do is decide whether the short term gains outweigh the long term benefits. Look no further than Zubrus. He was drafted 15th overall by the Flyers and they "rushed" him into the NHL. It could've stunted his development, we will never know. From what I see on Matteau, I don't want to take the risk of stunting his development and him becoming like Zubrus. I'd much rather see him go back to juniors and round out his offensive game to contribute as much as a Lucic does. He can be a hell of a player, and it's not like he's making THAT much of an impact right now.
Ahh I see, I didn't realize that. I looked at Lucic's stats and assumed he made the Bruins right out of juniors without thinking about when he was actually drafted.
Good point about Zubrus. Thinking about that now I kinda have to agree there.
love gagne, but him and the jake will have their first conversation when he joins the team and theyll either both sprain something, or concuss themselves.
Eh, I don't think depth had anything to do with it. Matteau was the best player available, and that's why Lou took him. Additionally, I don't think one pick influences future picks. That's usually how you end up with a bad draft.
If you are suggesting Zubrus should have been better because he was drafted 15th overall you should take a look at the 96 draft. He's had one of the best careers of all the forwards in that draft. I don't think playing in the NHL at 18 had any negative effect on him.
Lucic went back to juniors the year after he was drafted and joined the Bruins as a 19 year old (second year post-draft). Matteau would be making the team as an 18 year old in his first year post-draft.
What the Devils have to do is decide whether the short term gains outweigh the long term benefits. Look no further than Zubrus. He was drafted 15th overall by the Flyers and they "rushed" him into the NHL. It could've stunted his development, we will never know. From what I see on Matteau, I don't want to take the risk of stunting his development and him becoming like Zubrus. I'd much rather see him go back to juniors and round out his offensive game to contribute as much as a Lucic does. He can be a hell of a player, and it's not like he's making THAT much of an impact right now.
Major assumption that Zubrus playing so early stunted his growth. How many guys have been drafted and were allowed to "develop" in the Juniors/minors never amounted to anything?
Who Am I? (Ex-Devils player)
1. I've played for 8 NHL teams, including one twice.
2. I was drafted in the same draft as Chris Terreri.
3. I've played on two teams that made it to the Stanley Cup winning once.
4. I never played for the team I was drafted by.
5. I was on the Kings when I played my 1,000th game.
My bad, two not three SCF teams. I screwed that one up.
I have absolutely no doubt he will be an NHL player. At the very least, we will see him become someone like Bernier. But at his fullest potential, he can be one hell of a player and a difference maker. Right now, he's not a difference maker but he can definitely hold his own.
I said it when the pick was made that it was a very safe pick, and it was a smart one by Lou, knowing our forward depth is/was very weak. He took a couple of projects later on too in Gavrus and Kerfoot because Matteau was a pretty safe pick.
Who Am I? (Ex-Devils player)
1. I've played for 8 NHL teams, including one twice.
2. I was drafted in the same draft as Chris Terreri.
3. I've played on two teams that made it to the Stanley Cup winning once.
4. I never played for the team I was drafted by.
5. I was on the Kings when I played my 1,000th game.
My bad, two not three SCF teams. I screwed that one up.
Thought it was O'Donnell except for the year Terreri was drafted. Terreri was drafted in 83. O'Donnell just retired so no way he's that old. O'Donnell was also the answer to one of these last week too I believe.