hawksfan50
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 14,102
- 1,983
Lockdiwns do not wok...shown scientifically...always cane too late...at vestcsome delay to eventual transmission ...cause tge viruszwill do what it will do..but tge Net Harms of lockdiwns vastly outweigh tge benefits of such artificial delays ...the idea was to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed ...but a strange thing has happened...mortality and severity rates for Covid 19 have Not matched the (Expected ) "2nd wave" spike s in cases (or more correctly the seasonal effect fir respiratory problem hospitalizations .....so it is not clear if Covid patients Due to tge Virus itself,are tgexsoke cause of any hospiital overburden this falk-winter season but rather possibly starting to see the effect of tge collateral damage net harms caused by lockdowbs in taking up non-ICU beds for other reasons than the Covid virus itself and tgat removes beds from Covid admitted patients (test positives( who are not severe enough forctge ICU.
What we do not know is if flu patients are causing Ny higher burden than expected or lower burden than what was expected nor how many patients in hospital were not Covid pisitivexwhen admitted but got pisitive while admitted...
But if the spike in falk-wibtwr cases (expected) for Covid 19 is not showing tge same high mortality rateszas in March April and tge treatments are better and the hospital stays shorter for Covid patients now...then if ICU capacity levels are a problem now or overall hospital beds are a problem now for capacity this fLk-winter(not sure if tgeycare but the dire warnings of doom from Covid spikes seen ti tell tge public to flatten tgat curve again ( then tge capacity issuesxcoukd very well be eitger from other medical problems tgan just Covid 19 or more likely starting to see tge effect of tge collateral damage from lockdowns...We know for instance that drug overdoses cases are way up ...how many beds now occupied by that excess number?What about tge heart and cancer issue patients whose treatment got pushed off by covid measures in hizpitalsxearluer this year?Are they needing h hospitalization now?And arectgey getting Covid while in hospital now?
My point is tgere seems to be sone cognitive dissonance going on ...when you get the expected falk-winterslije in cases yet much lower severity length of stay and much less mortality than in the initial "1st wave" in the spring...but we all knew that tge collateral damage from kocjdowns woukd eventualkyvshow up in taking up hospital beds and death rates for other than covid patients going up.
Adding more lickdown would be increasing tge collateral dMage forctgese otgernecessary care need patients...
Also tgere is NO WAY a society can remaining permanent licjdown..
Also why tge spike in cassAfter masks rules and very hogh mask wearing g acceptance in use for months and months now before tge 2nd wave exkected anyway spikes?
It shows tgat masks hardly a barrier to transmission but perhaps tgey decrease severityby reducing tge amount of viral load getting into a target ...
That is tge only conjecture you can determine by logic...Masjs did not prevent expected fLk-wi ter slikebut if severity is less tgan it was in the spring 1st wave thenyou might credit maks with helping in that ...Or severity coukd be down for other reasons...the virusvitself changed or simply the treatnentsxare better now...whatever. the combination of less severity/mortality for ovid patients plus tge collateral damage negatives together are reasons we shoukd Not go to lockdown again
It only will make things a lot worse over time.
As to Pfizer's 90% effective vaccibe and when it gets deployed....I have pisted earlier on tge strange fact tgat tge Pfizer CEO sold 62% of his stock in tge company the day after they made the announcement of the miracle vaccine.
That makes no sense to me...It shoukd be a cash cow for Pfizer so why sell stock?
Pfizer dividends shoukdcrose...so if this is the miracle cure,why sell?
You have to suspect something is wrong i this occurs!
What we do not know is if flu patients are causing Ny higher burden than expected or lower burden than what was expected nor how many patients in hospital were not Covid pisitivexwhen admitted but got pisitive while admitted...
But if the spike in falk-wibtwr cases (expected) for Covid 19 is not showing tge same high mortality rateszas in March April and tge treatments are better and the hospital stays shorter for Covid patients now...then if ICU capacity levels are a problem now or overall hospital beds are a problem now for capacity this fLk-winter(not sure if tgeycare but the dire warnings of doom from Covid spikes seen ti tell tge public to flatten tgat curve again ( then tge capacity issuesxcoukd very well be eitger from other medical problems tgan just Covid 19 or more likely starting to see tge effect of tge collateral damage from lockdowns...We know for instance that drug overdoses cases are way up ...how many beds now occupied by that excess number?What about tge heart and cancer issue patients whose treatment got pushed off by covid measures in hizpitalsxearluer this year?Are they needing h hospitalization now?And arectgey getting Covid while in hospital now?
My point is tgere seems to be sone cognitive dissonance going on ...when you get the expected falk-winterslije in cases yet much lower severity length of stay and much less mortality than in the initial "1st wave" in the spring...but we all knew that tge collateral damage from kocjdowns woukd eventualkyvshow up in taking up hospital beds and death rates for other than covid patients going up.
Adding more lickdown would be increasing tge collateral dMage forctgese otgernecessary care need patients...
Also tgere is NO WAY a society can remaining permanent licjdown..
Also why tge spike in cassAfter masks rules and very hogh mask wearing g acceptance in use for months and months now before tge 2nd wave exkected anyway spikes?
It shows tgat masks hardly a barrier to transmission but perhaps tgey decrease severityby reducing tge amount of viral load getting into a target ...
That is tge only conjecture you can determine by logic...Masjs did not prevent expected fLk-wi ter slikebut if severity is less tgan it was in the spring 1st wave thenyou might credit maks with helping in that ...Or severity coukd be down for other reasons...the virusvitself changed or simply the treatnentsxare better now...whatever. the combination of less severity/mortality for ovid patients plus tge collateral damage negatives together are reasons we shoukd Not go to lockdown again
It only will make things a lot worse over time.
As to Pfizer's 90% effective vaccibe and when it gets deployed....I have pisted earlier on tge strange fact tgat tge Pfizer CEO sold 62% of his stock in tge company the day after they made the announcement of the miracle vaccine.
That makes no sense to me...It shoukd be a cash cow for Pfizer so why sell stock?
Pfizer dividends shoukdcrose...so if this is the miracle cure,why sell?
You have to suspect something is wrong i this occurs!