McDocram99
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2020
- 1
- 0
So I was just watching a Rishaug video on TSN (its the 2nd video down in the NHL section right now), and Rishaug, at the 1:00 minute mark he clearly says "McDavid actually had a lot of success without surgery, that PCL did in fact heal itself Rod, and the results are showing this year". Soooo..... is Rishaug just relaying wrong information and his PCL is still unattached and torn, or did it actually heal and he has an in-tact PCL?
The docs in this thread are saying that it CAN'T heal on its own, without surgery, so either:
A) It wasn't fully torn, and it healed (Rishaug being correct, and the reports of his PCL being fully torn are not correct)
B) It was fully torn, and it didn't heal (Rishaug being wrong, and the docs on this thread being right)
C) It was fully torn, and it did heal somehow (Rishaug right, and the docs on this thread being wrong)
I'm very confused.
Only way that ligament regenerated or healed itself is if he did stem cell therapy...plenty of people avoiding reconstructive knee surgeries and knee replacements by doing stem cell therapy, someone like McDavid who has unlimited monetary resources and hundreds of millions of dollars at stake would destroy his career by having surgery, he just would never ever be close to what he was/is. Stem cell therapy would be the first thing to try prior to going the surgery route:
Regenerative Medicine for Sports Injuries
Traditional western based doctors simply can't agree on the function of the pcl let alone how to treat and injury to it given the different schools of thought, this is why he received different opinions, probably all different protocols:
Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Injury and Treatments – Caring Medical