OrrNumber4
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2002
- 15,909
- 5,174
Brad Richards is a better player than Mike Richards. If you don't think Mike Richards is declining, you seriously need to watch a game.
I think that's pretty fair.
But yeah, the Kings couldn't have won without superclutch fourth line deadweight. Without him, they wouldn't have won. Just like without Burish the Hawks wouldn't have won, am I right ON4?
Implication being that Burish:Chicago 2010 is Richards:LA 2012/2014?
Richards certainly had some very good games in the 2014 playoffs. If you consider those just outliers, or luck, then of course you won't value Richards very much. If instead you take those games at face value, then you will value Richards more.