and yet you don't seem able to comprehend why trading him for a guy who is older and less adept at improving the players he plays with (and more reliant on skilled partners/linemates to make the most of his skill set) was a bad decision?
Seems like you haven't put much thought into what you are posting about.
It’s not about putting a thought . This debate has been discussed to death .Its like complaining about your ex girlfriend . Move the f on.
It’s done, it’s over. If we can get 5 years from Weber I would be ok with it. He would be 37 and done I guess . In 5 years , Subban might not have had the same impact who knows ? Subban won’t fix our offence and Center woes nor can he play goalie . If we talking about offence well guess what ? Weber had almost 20 frickin goals last year .Both have 6 goals this year and Subban is playing with Roman Josi and is part of the best d Corp in the league .I know Subban is a much better puck mover and passer but nobody in our team can finish . I understand he left but Subban alone wasn’t doing it, he is no Mcdavid. I actually got tired of watching his spines and bad overall play in his last years as a Hab.
We didn’t build a good team around Price and Subban. It’s too bad, now our fanbase has to move on . Each time I surf on Hfboards , I read the Subban-Weber debate. Subban wasn’t our saviour, the farthest we went is the eastern concerence finals with him and we lost because we were missing Price.
Move on and accept the fact that while not being the best long term move, Weber still has 3-5 good years ahead of him. That’s enough for me. According to your statistics , Subban would collapse at 34 years old which is basically 5 years away.
There is no thought to put into it anymore, Molson has to have some balls and fire Bergevin.
