Lazlo Hollyfeld
The jersey ad still sucks
- Mar 4, 2004
- 28,617
- 27,073
it was actually pretty conclusive. The overhead and ice level both show that the puck and glove were over the line.
No the overhead did NOT show the puck. It doesn't matter if you can deduce that the puck is probably over the line, that has NEVER been the standard.
I could obviously see the puck was in the back of the mesh of the glove and that portion was over the line. Watch the overhead, unless the puck was stuffed under his wrist the puck was across the line.No the overhead did NOT show the puck. It doesn't matter if you can deduce that the puck is probably over the line, that has NEVER been the standard.
What happened to Nyquist? He and Blashill are still yelling about it.
I could obviously see the puck was in the back of the mesh of the glove and that portion was over the line. Watch the overhead, unless the puck was stuffed under his wrist the puck was across the line.
It doesn't matter. The Red Wings have been repeatedly screwed over the years by goals that were obviously over the line but were ruled inconclusive. That is the normal standard for calls, and there was no goal call on the ice.
Bull**** call.
No, it was the right call. Would you rather they just continue to make bad calls because that's what they did in the past? Or do you want them to continue to adjust to make the best calls possible.
Even Osgood says it was in and that the video was conclusive.I want them to stop changing the ****ing rules every other incident.
Even Osgood says it was in and that the video was conclusive.
And by the precedent set over the past 10 years, he's wrong.
I'd never have a problem with us beating the Penguins.Usually Larkin having a good game by scoring and playing good defense would be enough for me. But since the Pens are on the outside looking in... I hope we win
You need some one pull piano.Bertuzzi really adds something to that Zetterberg and Nyquist pairing.
You need some one pull piano.