Pip
Registered User
Yeah. Drafts almost always look good when the players picked are still in junior or overseas. If you’re a draft pick who’s not lighting up junior that is VERY concerning since high junior production is basically a prerequisite for doing anything as a pro."Benning has been great at drafting; look at all these great picks from [INSERT YEAR OF MOST RECENT DRAFT]!"
As for the 2014 draft, it looks really good in the sense that Virtanen, McCann, and Forsling are NHLers, Demko is tracking well and Tryamkin would be an NHLer if he hadn’t bolted. That’s a good haul even if the Virtanen pick was terrible given the other options available. The problem in my mind of crediting Benning for this draft is that he has been so willing to move Forsling and McCann, plus they seemed to have mishandled Tryamkin (you could argue that he simply didn’t receive special treatment which is fair but when picking talented players who do have a strong KHL threat, you do have to cater to them to a degree). The Forsling trade especially seems suspect since who trades one of their recent picks who is tracking very well for a marginal NHLer with some upside. It leads me to believe that Benning had limited input.
What’s most concerning to me is the development of young players. Multiple high end prospects have come in too heavy and management at both the AHL level and NHL level have been extremely suspect.
At the end of the day drafting is only a part of rebuilding and I truly believe that Canucks management and coaching is actively hurting our young players.