Hookslide
Registered User
- Nov 19, 2018
- 4,134
- 3,441
You have a dark sense of humor.I laughed, it was pretty funny.
You have a dark sense of humor.I laughed, it was pretty funny.
lol it was dead you guys brought it back. And i stand by my proposal, joe pavelski is good
No team would give up that much for JP. I like the guy always have, but he's simply not worth that much.
You can stand behind the proposal all you want, I assure you, no GM would.
you dont think hes worth a 1st a reclamation project and a b level prospect? How far off is that?
you dont think hes worth a 1st a reclamation project and a b level prospect? How far off is that?
Well Debrusk isn't a reclamation project, and no I don't think any team in the Bruins position would give up that much for a 36 year old making 7 million a year.
What if that 36 year old making 7 million was good?
I'm speaking in reality not hypotheticals here, let's stick to that.
pavelski is good. More specifically over the next few years. Certainly better than debrusk a 1st and lauko over the next 2
Thats hysterical....When did Pavelski turn into Messier.......My offer is this.....Studnincka and a 2
Yes lets talk about stupidLet me say this up front, I like Pavelski talented ,high ,energy, productive, fun player too watch . With that said you do not trade a young guy that has scored over 20 goals a year 24 year ols for a 36 year old making 7 mil a year .Some of these other proposals put out there are just as stupid , he is not getting you a first rounder. I do not want to insult any of the posters but I will anyways GO BACK AND WATCH BASKETBALL.........
That is a head scratcher post.............Yes lets talk about stupid
IF YOU WANT TO WATCH KIDS PLAY WATCH THE CHL.
How about Sesame Street then?That is a head scratcher post.............
When Dallas traded Jagr to Boston they got a Conditional 2nd that ended up being a 1st for a 40+ year old Jagr. Point being age doesn't mean a whole lot when it comes to a talented player who is putting up good numbers at an older age.Let me say this up front, I like Pavelski talented ,high ,energy, productive, fun player too watch . With that said you do not trade a young guy that has scored over 20 goals a year 24 year ols for a 36 year old making 7 mil a year .Some of these other proposals put out there are just as stupid , he is not getting you a first rounder. I do not want to insult any of the posters but I will anyways GO BACK AND WATCH BASKETBALL.........
Yes and how did that work out ? The Bruins back then were younger and could afford to take on a aged player , right now their core is aged sorry that argument does not stand and he was a rental , Pavelski carries another year at 7 mil and they have some young players contracts coming up that are going to needed to be addressed. Look like I said in my post love the player just not the cost.........When Dallas traded Jagr to Boston they got a Conditional 2nd that ended up being a 1st for a 40+ year old Jagr. Point being age doesn't mean a whole lot when it comes to a talented player who is putting up good numbers at an older age.
When Dallas traded Jagr to Boston they got a Conditional 2nd that ended up being a 1st for a 40+ year old Jagr. Point being age doesn't mean a whole lot when it comes to a talented player who is putting up good numbers at an older age.
When Dallas traded Jagr to Boston they got a Conditional 2nd that ended up being a 1st for a 40+ year old Jagr. Point being age doesn't mean a whole lot when it comes to a talented player who is putting up good numbers at an older age.
Yes and how did that work out ? The Bruins back then were younger and could afford to take on a aged player , right now their core is aged sorry that argument does not stand and he was a rental , Pavelski carries another year at 7 mil and they have some young players contracts coming up that are going to needed to be addressed. Look like I said in my post love the player just not the cost.........
Tentative yes from this Stars fan.....I do like DeBrusk, no clue who Lauko is though. Seems like he's doing ok in the AHL so far.
If the Stars keep trending upwards and make a late push then I doubt Pavs gets shopped, but if they start to plummet again I would hope that Jim Nill would fish around for the best possible landing spots.
He's never really been one to hoard draft picks though.....can't remember the last time Dallas traded for a first round pick.
History of NHL trades by the Dallas Stars - NHL Trade Tracker
2004.
2004 was the last time Dallas acquired another team's 1st round pick in a trade.
That's insane.
Yes and how did that work out ? The Bruins back then were younger and could afford to take on a aged player , right now their core is aged sorry that argument does not stand and he was a rental , Pavelski carries another year at 7 mil and they have some young players contracts coming up that are going to needed to be addressed. Look like I said in my post love the player just not the cost.........
Thats hysterical....When did Pavelski turn into Messier.......My offer is this.....Studnincka and a 2
what players? whos coming up they need to address? Rask and krejci are off the books next year. Pavelski takes krejcis money. Carlo is the only player worth retaining and theyll have tons of money to do so.
it worked out fine they went to the finals. The fact pavelski isnt a rental makes him more expensive. Hes also much better than krejci at this stage and slots in krejcis spot next year. 2nd line center issue solved (or kicked down the road another year)