Because the post I was responding to said 20-25 goals and 40-45 points, and that would be the low end of Zucker's production on the Wild, without being on Minnesota's #1 PP and playing with far lesser centers and a far less potent offensive team than he'll be playing with here.
If we're going to require both 20+ goals
and 40+ points, the number of players who hit that mark last season is even fewer.
Contrary to popular belief, simply playing with Crosby or Malkin doesn't guarantee a bump in point production. Especially since the #1 PP unit is hard to crack, and it gets the overwhelming bulk of the PP minutes.
In terms of Zucker's career indicating where he should be - I took his games played, goals scored, points scored, and converted into 82-game paces for his entire career.
Mean goals per 82-game season: 20.3
Mean points per 82-game season: 38.1
Median goals per 82-game season: 21.3
Median points per 82-game season: 41.8
Stripping out his first three partial seasons where he was back and forth in the AHL and NHL:
Mean goals: 25.1
Mean points: 45.9
Median goals: 23.9
Median points: 45.7
Standard deviation is 6.57 for goals, and 11.34 for points, so there's a fair amount of variance in there...
Basically, 20-25 goals and 40-45 points per season is pretty much his career averages, albeit he's usually on the higher end of that range.
****ing McCann is on pace for 22 goals and 48 points this year despite playing the majority of his time without Crosby or Malkin.
So yes, I expect more production out of Zucker - a scoring winger making 5.5 mil per who will be stapled to Crosby and Malkin's hips - than McCann, who's spent most of his time in the bottom 6.
Due to Crosby and/or Malkin being out of the lineup for most of the first half, McCann hasn't spent most of his time in the bottom 6 this season - his TOI/G with the Pens is up almost two minutes over his career average. Coincidentally, he's having a career year...