The Kingslayer
Registered User
CMac worst than Francois Giguere.Another impressive win against one of the worst teams in the league. Keep cooking Cmac.
CMac worst than Francois Giguere.Another impressive win against one of the worst teams in the league. Keep cooking Cmac.
Holy shit, never even thought about this but, yep. Didn't think it was possible but this is the truth.CMac worst than Francois Giguere.
Hold the f*** on now lolCMac worst than Francois Giguere.
I got over the Smyth signing. Its going to take forever to get over Ryan Johansen. I might never get over it.Hold the f*** on now lol
I believe it is unlimited due to the delay of game penalty.Just got home. So did anyone figure out why Arizona ended up with two challenges in this game? I thought if you challenged a goal and lost, you didn't get another chance to challenge. You only get a second challenge if you win the first one, right? Or is it unlimited now with the delay of game penalty?
I bet they were looking at Bo playing RD. If they like what they see (and they should have tonight) then Bo for Mitts would be a good base for a trade.I wonder who the AGM of the Sabres was scouting tonight. If it was an off season trade for Mikko, tonight was a horrendous showcase.
G for Mitts would be excellent.
CMac worst than Francois Giguere.
This sounds more like the NBA challenge protocol. IMO any BA or NHL team should be able to challenge whatever number of times, as long as they accept the punishment. In the NHL it is already a penalty. In the NBA, any lost challenge that fails should cost 4 free-throws plus the ball.Just got home. So did anyone figure out why Arizona ended up with two challenges in this game? I thought if you challenged a goal and lost, you didn't get another chance to challenge. You only get a second challenge if you win the first one, right? Or is it unlimited now with the delay of game penalty?
They got rid of that rule a long time ago quite frankly.Just got home. So did anyone figure out why Arizona ended up with two challenges in this game? I thought if you challenged a goal and lost, you didn't get another chance to challenge. You only get a second challenge if you win the first one, right? Or is it unlimited now with the delay of game penalty?
I guess I just missed that change. It doesn't come up often that you see that many challenges in a game.They got rid of that rule a long time ago quite frankly.
Now you can challenge as many goals as you like but it's a Delay of Game penalty everything you get one wrong.
So Jared has no more excuses for holding onto his time out like its Bitcoin.They got rid of that rule a long time ago quite frankly.
Now you can challenge as many goals as you like but it's a Delay of Game penalty everything you get one wrong.
Barely beat the Yotes. This team needs another team only meeting where they beat the shit out of Mikko Rantanen.
I guess that makes CMac 500x worse.Not even a far fight. Giguere never got gifted 3 top 15 players, and wasted 2 of their prime years.
I know this has been tossed around in the trade thread… if the Avs SOMEHOW win the cup I think you trade rants for kings ransom in assets and you use that to clear roster space and lengthen the contention window. His play this year scares me for his next contract.Just wait until we get Nuke, Landeskog and Rantanen back.
It scares me in another way... Like a player who knows FA is just one year away....His play this year scares me for his next contract.
When the challenge was first introduced, you would lose your timeout on a failed challenge. It has since been changed to a penalty.This sounds more like the NBA challenge protocol. IMO any BA or NHL team should be able to challenge whatever number of times, as long as they accept the punishment. In the NHL it is already a penalty. In the NBA, any lost challenge that fails should cost 4 free-throws plus the ball.
Trade him either way to extend the window.I know this has been tossed around in the trade thread… if the Avs SOMEHOW win the cup I think you trade rants for kings ransom in assets and you use that to clear roster space and lengthen the contention window. His play this year scares me for his next contract.
Great point . We always seem to struggle against this team.Did we sweep the Yotes the last year we won the Cup?
Great point . We always seem to struggle against this team.
no thanksI bet they were looking at Bo playing RD. If they like what they see (and they should have tonight) then Bo for Mitts would be a good base for a trade.
Great point . We always seem to struggle against this team.
The series in 21-22 was 2-2. We blew out the Yotes once, and the rest of the games were close, like this one was.
View attachment 822173
I've never seen anything like a fan base so upset with a win.
This board is like this, perpetually.
For years it was always the wild that gave us fits. Trapping us to death. Ugh us dump and chasing every zone entry. Our performances against these teams are very rarely indicative of anything.Yup. Dont know what it is, but the Yotes very often give us a hard time....