No.So, the choice is between Lemieux alone or Crosby and Ovechkin?
If it's a two-for, can I take Howe and Orr?
I imagine prime Ovechkin being disgruntled as f*** playing second fiddle.
Imagine the best one on one forward playing in a league where the only way to slow him down is removed and the defensemen he is going up against are largely midgets compared to what he dealt with his entire career.
I love Ovi and Sid. But Mario is one of the few players you can say was on another level in terms of on ice play. There has never been a player before or after Lemieux that could basically do whatever he wanted on the ice given his size and ability.
Sid and Ovi vs pretty much every other forward in history I’m taking. I think you probably even say over Gretzky given Wayne’s size in today’s league might be a negative. Today’s game though is specifically built for Mario to excel in.
cool. Regardless, Sid and Ovie do not seem like this slam dunk fit as a leadership team.
As were both the players mentioned except the other 2 have the individual accolades to backup those claims and Ovechkin never played on a stacked team like the Avalanche did either.
Also, anyone thinking Lemieux is just magically putting up 180 points in today's NHL is nuts. I'm sorry, this notion that players from yesteryear just waltz into today's game and perform even better is crazy. They didn't' stop making great hockey players in the 80's and 90's. Again, I'm not saying he isn't a better player all time but he isn't just obliterating the league, sorry.
I won't mention Crosby because it's you pens fans who say he's this great leader. As for OV, he was benched and asked to block shots by a clueless clown in Hunter, asked to switch positions by a rookie coach in Oates, asked to change his game by Trotz, asked by management to lose weight to adapt to the "new" faster NHL. He always did everything without ever complaining. I don't think either of them would have a problem being "second fiddle". And I'd trust them way more as leaders over Lemieux who was one of the biggest babies in NHL history. I'm going to complain that the league is too physical, but since no one listened to my whining, I'm going to quit. Zubov trade already mentioned. Etc, etc. Quit on your team. Great leadership.
Ovechkin has not scored or sniffed 100 points pace since 2010
just wondering how old you arel your answer may shed some insight on your argumentsI'd argue you live in nostalgia land with this type of take because it's nonsense. Crosby and Ovechkin in their primes would see their stats balloon and all 3 players you mentioned other than Jagr aren't near prime Crosby and Ovechkin.
It's no doubt Lemieux is the best player but if you think it's heads and shoulders better than either or, again, banana land.
If McDavid is pacing 155. Lemieux is hitting 180As were both the players mentioned except the other 2 have the individual accolades to backup those claims and Ovechkin never played on a stacked team like the Avalanche did either.
Also, anyone thinking Lemieux is just magically putting up 180 points in today's NHL is nuts. I'm sorry, this notion that players from yesteryear just waltz into today's game and perform even better is crazy. They didn't' stop making great hockey players in the 80's and 90's. Again, I'm not saying he isn't a better player all time but he isn't just obliterating the league, sorry.
89 points is not 100Literally scored 89 points in his last full season (2019).
As for the OP.... 2 generational players > 1 generational player.
89 points is not 100
89 points is not 100
Ovechkin has not scored or sniffed 100 points pace since 2010
Sid and Ovechkin have wonderful primes. But they are not anything special. Their longevity in terms of Sid’s championships and ability to dominate and Ovie’s sheer ability to score goals over his career are what makes them top ten all time players, not their primes.
Man, I thought your takes on Sid were awful.
No offense but this is kind of Ironic. Sid and OV absolutely have specials primes and peaks.
They aren't anything that has not been done before.
Best primes we've seen in the last 15 years or so, but players did similar things in the 90s and 2000s.
1st in goals, GPG, pts, PPG. Hart and lindsay winner. Other than Lemieux, name the 90s and 00s "players" who did that?
Crosby , Ovechkin haven't and won't reach Lemieux's level .1st in goals, GPG, pts, PPG. Hart and lindsay winner. Other than Lemieux, name the 90s and 00s "players" who did that?
42, my first important hockey memory was sitting in my underwear in Sauble Beach with my dad watching the Canada Cup in 87. I'm not young, just not living with rose colored nostalgia glasses on like so many here.just wondering how old you arel your answer may shed some insight on your arguments
McDavid is a better skater and every bit as good with the puck on his stick, Lemieux isn't blowing him out by 30 points despite his size advantage, sorry.If McDavid is pacing 155. Lemieux is hitting 180
Lemieux would have demanded to be traded if Hunter did to him what he did to Ovechkin. He's done everything his franchise has asked him to despite repeated failings by the players around him to perform remotely adequately during his prime when he needed them to.I'm really having a hard time putting Ovechkin and "leadership" in the same sentence. All-time great goal-scorer yes, but he is hardly among the pantheon of greatest team captains...