Pavels Dog
Registered User
We have a d core? I must have missed the memo.I get that but im sure the players that were replaced were easily replaced ie sent down/waived ect... I don't see that as the case with our current d core
We have a d core? I must have missed the memo.I get that but im sure the players that were replaced were easily replaced ie sent down/waived ect... I don't see that as the case with our current d core
yes, as much as they suck, they are under contract that will be hard to move.We have a d core? I must have missed the memo.
we are close to finally getting out from under them. Kronwall's finally expires this season, and ericsson/daley both expire next season. But don't worry we will sign green for 3 years.yes, as much as they suck, they are under contract that will be hard to move.
exactly my point. how about we not sign an aging vet and give some kids a try. just my 2 centswe are close to finally getting out from under them. Kronwall's finally expires this season, and ericsson/daley both expire next season. But don't worry we will sign green for 3 years.
it is when you have contracts that can easily be moved. I just don't see that with our D core.
We have room for one kid from day 1 without any extra moves. Any injuries and a 2nd kid gets his chance. Daley, Green and Jensen would all be on tradeable contracts with Kronner/E as constant LTIR risks.exactly my point. how about we not sign an aging vet and give some kids a try. just my 2 cents
All of which have a NTC/NMC except for Jensen. I don't see Kenny moving any of them to give a kid a chance. At least with Green not signed 1 of them gets to play full time. I'm fine with one kid playing full time.I see this as a bigger issue with the forwards. Currently, we have 1 dman with more than 2 years of term on the roster.
All of which have a NTC/NMC except for Jensen. I don't see Kenny moving any of them to give a kid a chance. At least with Green not signed 1 of them gets to play full time. I'm fine with one kid playing full time.
I guess we’ll have to wait and see but I’m guessing there will be ample opportunity for the kids. Like I said, nothing I proposed is a stretch and Holland’s track record is that where he loads the roster then integrates the kids throughout the season.
Can't even respect Green anymore, willing to go to the bottom feeder, instead of chasing the Cup. Character much?
Can't even respect Green anymore, willing to go to the bottom feeder, instead of chasing the Cup. Character much?
He can do that on D, he won't be able to do it up front. I seriously doubt our D is as healthy this year, I think the kids will get looks.
Agreed. Signing even one of Vanek or Val pretty much guarantees at least 2 of Svechnikov, Zadina and Rasmussen won’t be on the team.
This is what I’m hoping. AA/nyquist +svech+Jensen for Faulk makes total sense to me.It also could push for a trade. You can lose 2 young forwards for a D. And you already have replacements.
This is what I’m hoping. AA/nyquist +svech+Jensen for Faulk makes total sense to me.
I’m not totally sure but doesn’t faulks NTC kick in July 1st?
Whether any of us think it's realistic or not, the sense I got from the Canes board is that Carolina wants a 1st round pick plus a decent roster player for Faulk.This is what I’m hoping. AA/nyquist +svech+Jensen for Faulk makes total sense to me.
I’m not totally sure but doesn’t faulks NTC kick in July 1st?
Maybe to get around that we can take back darling with that, and ship out Howard for an asset.Whether any of us think it's realistic or not, the sense I got from the Canes board is that Carolina wants a 1st round pick plus a decent roster player for Faulk.
I think it's safe to say that the pieces you listed won't get it done.
Last year, with exactly the same group of defenseman (except frequent scratch Ouellet), defensemen called up from Grand Rapids played a grand total of 6 NHL games.There's going to be plenty of opportunities with our walking wounded defensemen.