I'm not trying to say that he's gone and that's the end of discussion and anybody who thinks otherwise has a bad opinion. (edit: removed exclamation mark, came off like I was yelling!!!
sorry)
I'm just pointing out that if you are informing your idea that players Chabot's age always get re-signed on the basis of how every other NHL team has operated, you're using flawed information because we have shown over the last two years that we aren't being run that way. The decisions we're making are unprecedented.
There is a big difference between Chabot and Norris or Wolanin. The difference is those players are starting their ELCs and benefit immensely from being on a rebuilding team where there is more opportunity for them to produce while on their ELC. Chabot's ELC is up.
Even if Chabot kind of likes it here, his representation has to have a reasonable idea that he's going to get the Aho offer sheet if he hits July 1st, because another team will think that Melnyk won't match. So all of a sudden, Chabot is in a position where he can get a contract that would be more lucrative than what his actual historical market value is. That market value would be 10-11 percent of the cap at 7-8 years. All of a sudden, his agent probably understands that by being willing to leave the Senators, Chabot can get 10-11 percent of the cap and only have to give up 5 years, which then sets him up to cash in on another 7-8 year contract while he is still young. Amazing situation for him money wise.
You bring up Karl and others leaving, but this isn't an emotional argument. People are just looking at what has happened and drawing conclusions, maybe some good ones, maybe some bad ones.