BlueBaron
Registered User
Personally I am of the mind that we need both our young goalies not yet on the Marlies and our 2 1rst round D and only wingers and picks should be dealt.
Zaitsev is also available.
Zaitsev is also available.
Not even close.Sandin or Dermott.
People voting Sandin really don't know him, I've been a big supporter of Dermott since his draft year, but something about Sandin just gets me excited. He's so smart.
I think the patience plan is still in play. Sandin and Dermott are players we would want to add so why would we expand either of them to get a like player?I'd agree, but it seems like Dubas is looking to add another long term player like Tavares rather than a rental.
Lilly
CF%: 56.8(2nd among regular d man)
CF%REL: 1.5(1st among regular d man)
CF60: 58.3(1st among regular d man)
CA60: 44.3(5th among regular d man)
OZ%: 32.2(lowest among regular d man)
Sandin
CF%: 55.8(4th among regular d man)
CF%REL: -3.1(4th among regular d man)
CF60: 48.60(5th among regular d man)
CA60: 38.5(best among regular d man)
OZ%: 36.8(5th highest among regular d man)
Sandin has had a good start, but Lilly has been much better this season facing tougher competition.
Some people are underrating Lilly, and overrating Sandin.
Thanks to Jeffler for providing the data.
I think the patience plan is still in play. Sandin and Dermott are players we would want to add so why would we expand either of them to get a like player?
I agree with this.People aren't overrating Sandin. The excitement's warranted.
They're just underrating Lily.
I was expecting a Kap vs Willy thread.
same.
but i'm taking the RHD over the LDH all day. We've committed to the Pittsburgha model. Our cheap youth will provide with the right hand side cap promtiting
An enticing thought, but I hope we stand pat.The goal's to increase chances for a cup while maintaining a long-term outlook.
I'd prefer t0 keep Sandin/Dermott, but Pietrangelo gives the leafs a chance to win the cup. He's basically the defence version of Tavares.
If they all work out rielly dermott Lilly sandin would be a formidable top 4We should hang on to both and Lilly. It could come back to hurt us if Lilly is traded.
Only deals that make sense in a lilijgren deal would be something like kapanen+lilijgren+2019 1st( 3 high end pieces). For a under 25 rhd type young talent. This deal would not be taken by the jackets right now, but if kapanen turns into a 60ish point winger at the end of the season and we see panarin walk as a f/a I wonder if the jets would do those three pieces for werenski. I would be looking at dealing lilijgren only for another high end defensive talent, and would be willing to add if we needed to depending on the level of player. As great as Pietrangelo is, he is a f/a soon. We should never be making deals for players with limited term who can potentially be had for just cap. If we are dealing a young talent like lilijgren we need another young and cost controlled player coming back. Ideally we keep him though and he can grow into a top pair defender for is over next 3 seasons.We should hang on to both and Lilly. It could come back to hurt us if Lilly is traded.
Sandin has had a good start, but Lilly has been much better this season facing tougher competition.
Some people are underrating Lilly, and overrating Sandin.
Sandin and Dermott are like players; Pietro is not. I'm not even talking handedness - we have zero top 4 dmen with size and adding Pietro would give us that dimension. I love Dermott and think I'm going to love Sandin, but they are both smaller.I think the patience plan is still in play. Sandin and Dermott are players we would want to add so why would we expand either of them to get a like player?