Scriptor
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2014
- 7,805
- 4,777
Yeah and Mete is only one of the best skater in the NHL... Lmao. Bouillon was good, so was Mike Weaver, and so many others. Mete is good, both stats and the eye-test confirm this
Yeah, good but, not top-4 D good and certainly not unbeatable by other prospects rising through the ranks.
A third pairing, for now, of Mete- Juulsen is awesome, if Romanov can quickly play a 2nd pairing role alongside Petry. If not, Mete is a better than nothing option playing above his head as a top-4 D.
Nobody denies Mete is a great skater but, he's not physical enough to only not be a defensive liability beyond his skating.
How that is difficult to grasp astounds me. He skates really well.
Does he win one on one battles in front of his net?
No.
Is he a great playmaker in the O-zone?
No.
Does he make good stretch passes?
No.
Does he have a good shot?
No.
Oh, yeah, he skates really well, though.
To be fair, he's at least got an active stick when battling for pucks along the boards. He's a + defenseman but, along with the skating, that's it. He needs to be much better at all the other skills or elite in at least another. I'd be happy with elite playmaking so he could be an asset on the PP.
Mete is a great third pairing D
Last edited: