BoxOfChocolates
Registered User
- Mar 7, 2010
- 11,398
- 1,542
Tyson Barrie
- Thread starter OwenNolan
- Start date
What surprises me most about this thread is how many people are actually willing to engage in it lol. You guys are doing yeoman's work keeping him distracted in this thread though. 
Foppa2118
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2003
- 52,385
- 31,642
Yes but I never would have thought it would actually serve its real purpose lol.
Arguing with guys who have no clue.
If you think Girard dummied Rads in that clip then there is no point. It's like arquing with my 6 year old son. Eventually you just have to give up and tell him you're right.
BoxOfChocolates
Registered User
- Mar 7, 2010
- 11,398
- 1,542
Physicality. Shot blocking. Toughness. Hitting. Tying up the man. Moving the guy infront of the net.
No. I dont think these things will ever be Makar's specialty. If you think they will then all the power to you.
BoxOfChocolates
Registered User
- Mar 7, 2010
- 11,398
- 1,542
The problem is you seem to associate good defence exludsively with those things. What about puck movement? Stick work? Positioning? Zone exits? Skating ability? etc. Those factors play just as important a role in good defence. So yes, I'd much rather have Makar out there than Ian Cole.
It's 2019, not 1999.
AvsMakar08
Registered User
AvsMakar08
Registered User
If Barrie decides not to sign an offer with Colorado between the dates of July 1st and August 1st, then trade him. Max amount I would give Barrie is 7M x 8 years. We have to remember that Barrie is not a number one or a number 2 Dman. He is a 2nd line Dman and a PP specialist.
This just in, a guy in top 10 ES scoring since the lockout is a PP specialist and 2nd pairing D.
And I've shown you examples of all the top teams in the league. How they all have size and toughness on D over small, skilled guys.
I've showed you the past Stanley Cup champions that show the same.
Even DeBouer said the same thing.
Its not my fault that you fail to see this.
And last I checked big, physical guys can do all the things you listed. And be able to light a guy up and win 1 on 1 battles.
If you think we will change the way hockey has been played for the last 100 years with 3 undersized guys who are not strong defensively then great. I just dont think its feasible.
And you are probably the only person in the hockey world that would put Cale Makar out in a big defensive situation over Ian Cole. If you think you know more than any coach that has ever coached then all the power to you.
Patagonia
Keep Whining
- Jan 6, 2017
- 7,624
- 3,246
I agree with all your points.
Just can’t see Barrie agreeing to the deal. Prefer that he’s moved at the draft so the AVs can draft a replacement.
dahrougem2
Registered User
dahrougem2
Registered User
Your entire moronic argument from the beginning has been predicated upon "well look at the two teams in the finals" and we provided you the size of the defensemen on the Boston Bruins, and they are SMALLER than the Avs defensemen overall.
So, again: what the **** are you even talking about?
Makar is almost the same size as Lidstrom.
EJ and Zadorov tower over Chelios and Bourque.
Can you spell dynasty?
EJ and Zadorov tower over Chelios and Bourque.
Can you spell dynasty?
lonelybadger
Registered User
How am I comparing Barrie to Mcdavid?
You're suggesting we trade Barrie for two bigger guys that are worth the same in $. I'm just pointing out that it would mean you would trade Boychuk and J.Staal for Mcdavid based on your opinion of tall players
Northern Avs Fan
Registered User
- May 27, 2019
- 21,970
- 29,648
Man... I'm so on the fence about the Barrie contract. I don't think he will be easily replaced if he eventually walks in free agency, or is traded for a top-six forward. On the other hand, I really don't want to give him, 8-8.5 million when he can sometimes be a liability in his own zone. I do think the Avs are starting to head into their window of contention and it's time to start getting a little more aggressive, and maybe that starts with signing one of their own.
McMetal
Writer of Wrongs
- Sep 29, 2015
- 14,182
- 12,283
People seem to think that Barrie needs to be "replaced" immediately, as if the team will score 50 fewer goals every year if you subtract him from the lineup. I think that's shortsighted, a lot of his points come on the first PP unit by just giving the puck to MacK and letting him do something magical with it. You could put Cole on the first PP and he would get inflated numbers as long as he could make a simple pass. And Barrie for a forward who could give us a second line behind 9296 would easily offset the offense at ES by balancing out our forward corps. It just makes sense, especially considering that we have plenty of puck movers on the team now.
Our top 4 without him would be:
Girard - Makar
Zadorov - EJ
That's not bad, especially considering that we have some prospects like Graves and Meloche pushing for NHL time soon too. It wouldn't be some massive blow to our top 6 D like people are suggesting. It's an easily survivable hit, and if it comes with the benefit of a top six player who can help our forward depth, it's a no brainer to trade him.
And that's not even mentioning the inconvenient fact that he has proven difficult to negotiate with in the past, and nobody has given a compelling reason why it would be any easier this time around. All in all, it's time to move on.
Our top 4 without him would be:
Girard - Makar
Zadorov - EJ
That's not bad, especially considering that we have some prospects like Graves and Meloche pushing for NHL time soon too. It wouldn't be some massive blow to our top 6 D like people are suggesting. It's an easily survivable hit, and if it comes with the benefit of a top six player who can help our forward depth, it's a no brainer to trade him.
And that's not even mentioning the inconvenient fact that he has proven difficult to negotiate with in the past, and nobody has given a compelling reason why it would be any easier this time around. All in all, it's time to move on.
