LDF
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2016
- 11,778
- 1,172
We don’t know which prospects will help the club until they develop and arrive. It’s shortsighted to trade those prospects now.
Some will bust, you don’t know which ones, and you need cover for those players that will ultimately bust.
Forbort is no better than Forsling. No point in acquiring him.
Quite true but in all honesty every team in every era is in the same situaton. Sometimes, in fact quite often, a team must make these types of decisions well before they would like. For example Stan traded away Stephen Johns and Paliotta before either played a single game and stuck with other Dmen who he felt were better in the long run. Sometimes it's impossible to horde prospects with unknown potential, hence it is necessary to make an educated guess as to which ones are expendable. That's where Hawks are at the moment when it comes to their prospects, especially on the blue line.
At end of day very little of this Hawks/Kings makes sense especially not the OP's dumping of Anisimov for a younger and better player while doing nothing to improve Kings cap situation
you make a great point, i just am hesitating on the idea that SB may have a 2nd trade idea to fix that one.... i can't see why SB would talk to LA. b/c i am going with the idea of a fa signing in the offseason.At end of day very little of this Hawks/Kings makes sense especially not the OP's dumping of Anisimov for a younger and better player while doing nothing to improve Kings cap situation
was Q under your desk as you typed this??Knowing Stan, he probably wants to add Phaneuf.
so let me get this straight, you want us to move out a good young dman in Forsling PLUS a 2020 1st for a 30 year old Muzzin??? am I reading this right?? and you have the balls to bitch about the moves Bowman has made...Forsling + 2020 1st for Muzzin provided Hawks have chance to talk to Muzzin agent about his clients interest in signing extension this summer
If Hawks and Muzzin camp can find comfortable assurance a deal can get done you pull trigger then in summer announce extension for Muzzin
If Hawks indeed plan to be players in FA and try to get back to competing in 2020 the 1st wont matter as much
Knowing Stan, he probably wants to add Phaneuf.
but you CONSTANTLY bitch about Bowman trading away our younger players and picks...now you want to do the very thing you have bashed our GM for years on for a 30 year old Muzzin?? Muzzin just makes no sense here. You as usual make no sense..I like Forsling but its very possible several of kids behind him are viewed higher by organization and that 2020 1st will hopefully be late pick if Hawks are sincere about turning things around this offseason
Draft kid high with tremendous upside at draft + Sign Panarin + Extend Muzzin + Promote a kid or two to roster next year= Should be improved team both defensively and offensively
There’s a joke somewhere about Stan liking crappy defenseman but Phaneuf isn’t in the punch line.Knowing Stan, he probably wants to add Phaneuf.
but you CONSTANTLY ***** about Bowman trading away our younger players and picks...now you want to do the very thing you have bashed our GM for years on for a 30 year old Muzzin?? Muzzin just makes no sense here.
We have Keith, Murphy, Seabs and Manning all signed for next year. We have already seen what Joker and Forsling can do here, we have kids ready to make the next step - you don't block them with Jake Muzzin right now...the ONLY way I would be okay with a trade like this is if ANOTHER trade immediately followed - meaning we move out Murphy or Seabs somehow...
I would be trying to get Cal Peterson as well.
This has nothing to do with the Kings but if the Pens are actually thinking of trading Murray, what about Crow for Murray (filling the +/- on each side).
I would be trying to get Cal Peterson as well.
This has nothing to do with the Kings but if the Pens are actually thinking of trading Murray, what about Crow for Murray (filling the +/- on each side).
I would be trying to get Cal Peterson as well.
This has nothing to do with the Kings but if the Pens are actually thinking of trading Murray, what about Crow for Murray (filling the +/- on each side).
Kings would be asking for Debrincat if you want Peterson
He is future of Kings organization in net
Quite true but in all honesty every team in every era is in the same situaton. Sometimes, in fact quite often, a team must make these types of decisions well before they would like. For example Stan traded away Stephen Johns and Paliotta before either played a single game and stuck with other Dmen who he felt were better in the long run. Sometimes it's impossible to horde prospects with unknown potential, hence it is necessary to make an educated guess as to which ones are expendable. That's where Hawks are at the moment when it comes to their prospects, especially on the blue line.
Debrincat for Peterson? This is just stupid.
Quick has 5 more years on his deal.
In regards to Murray, I think he is fixable and has proven he can win. It removes Crow's deal and he still has potential.
No thanks
The league has figured Murray out and the kid has issues with his confidence that wont be helped in a place like Chicago
Also I have no desire to see Corey skating around raising cup alongside Crosby
Debrincat for Peterson? This is just stupid.
Quick has 5 more years on his deal.
In regards to Murray, I think he is fixable and has proven he can win. It removes Crow's deal and he still has potential.