It was blatantly obvious that Dorion was using the unrealistic 5 year term to stall the Turris deal in order to buy time to consummate the Duchene trade. Whether he would have circled back and negotiated with Turris in good faith had a Duchene deal completely fallen through, I don't know. Turris' camp clearly knew what was going on since they tried to use pressure tactics and claimed they wouldn't negotiate a deal in season. They obviously changed their mind about that stance as Turris negotiated a deal with Nashville in order to facilitate a trade and end the entire ordeal.
The Senators digging in at 5 years with Turris' side also apparently never putting 6 years on the table is probably as healthy of an indication that we're going to get showing that one or both sides weren't attempting to participate in a proper negotiation.
We could not have fit Duchene in under our budget with Turris making 4.5M this past season. We would have had to make a series of trades to fit both players in during 16-17, let alone long term. Looking forward, it would have been unreasonable to expect us to fit Turris, Duchene, Stone, and Karlsson in under Melnyk's budget. Karlsson might end up traded to a different team in the short future, but I'm not sure it's reasonable to expect that Dorion would have been planning for a Karlsson trade in the summer of 2017 before the entire shit storm of our 2017-18 season kicked off. (Although one GM apparently did call him on Karlsson that summer.)
This does not mean that Turris would have signed a six year deal here, or that he would have signed as team friendly of a deal as he signed in Nashville here. Turris' contract with Nashville had no signing bonuses, no trade protection, and was on the low end for term and AAV for a 25 goal 55-65 point C who was previously playing 1st line minutes. Turris was in a position where because Dorion was never negotiating in good faith, if Turris wanted the upper end of his market value to stay in Ottawa, or wanted to leave entirely, we'll never know. This isn't to say Turris wanted to leave, but there'll never be an opportunity for him to look like the bad guy here because Dorion dumped him before he would have ever had the chance to dump us.
As far as "lol"gate goes. Which was Julie Turris replying "lol" to a Tweet reporting Pierre Dorion's statement that Mr.Melnyk does not make the hockey decisions. While it's been documented by those like Elliott Friedman that Melnyk is very hands on by the owner, we don't know the context of Melnyk's interference in a possible Turris extension. We also don't know the context of the inference to Kyle Turris (or his people) that ownership was preventing an extension. This makes it hard to evaluate the situation, because there are too many blank spaces. Was it direct interference with Melnyk specifically being unwilling to allow Dorion to commit long term to Kyle Turris? Or was it indirect, as in Dorion could not commit long term to Kyle Turris not because Melnyk's (at the time 68M) budget made Turris the odd man out if Dorion wanted to complete a transaction for Matt Duchene?