Bear, Benson and a mid-to-late first for two years of a 30 year old D who actually plays better on the left side.Must feel good when you improve your D for basically nothing and a magic bean.
Muffin. This is a pretty substantial return for LA.
Bear, Benson and a mid-to-late first for two years of a 30 year old D who actually plays better on the left side.Must feel good when you improve your D for basically nothing and a magic bean.
Basically 3 question marks for a proven legit top 4 dman. Sounds good to me.Bear, Benson and a mid-to-late first for two years of a 30 year old D who actually plays better on the left side.
Muffin. This is a pretty substantial return for LA.
Its very frustrating and depressing to see the Leafs making all the smart, right moves.
We had our chance to be the Leafs of the West, but made the wrong move too many times. **** youKatz.
Damn should of traded that McDavid pick for Muzzin. A question mark for a proven legit top 4 dman.Basically 3 question marks for a proven legit top 4 dman. Sounds good to me.
Chiarelli.
(FTFY )
Heard Gagner for Spooner proposal on the radio. Damn near identical contracts, think the Canucks would do it?
The Chia factorI like how we gave up a lot more for Petrovic/Manning than Dallas gave up for Oleksiak (who is way better than the former 2). Sigh
Heard Gagner for Spooner proposal on the radio. Damn near identical contracts, think the Canucks would do it?
Basically 3 question marks for a proven legit top 4 dman. Sounds good to me.
Sounds like you're pretty used to the Oilers not having a farm system. Read the past half dozen pages and it's a pretty common theme here.Basically 3 question marks for a proven legit top 4 dman. Sounds good to me.
You make that move if you have a solid roster depth with a couple holes. Until then moving those assets for a guy of Muzzins age is the complete opposite because by the time you fill the rest of the holes he is either gone or garbageUnfortunately, since we suck so hard right now, thats not the move for us. However, for a good team like Toronto this is a solid move. They shored up their D nicely and are well poised for the playoffs. This is the move teams should make when they have the right pieces. You always go for it when possible, you never know whatll happen next year
And that is not mortgaging the future at all. Someone compared it to Bear, Benson + ~2oth overall pick. You make that move all day long. If things go well for LAK, 1 of those players end up as a player as good as Muzzin in 5 years
You make that move if you have a solid roster depth with a couple holes. Until then moving those assets for a guy of Muzzins age is the complete opposite because by the time you fill the rest of the holes he is either gone or garbage
People just need to face the fact that the Oilers overpaid for Larsson. I still like Larsson and think he's going to be here for a long time.
The Toronto trade is like the normal trade deadline deal for 1.25 years of a top 4 D. Good trade for both parties involved.
BTW, I wouldn't trade our 1st + Benson + Bear for Muzzin
Keep the young guns
I used that line as an introduction to the post since people were talking about Larsson. However, some people like Brian Burke, like that trade.99% of people realize we overpaid for Larsson.
What would you guys add to nurse+ pulj for ghost+ patrick ?
Ghost is having a down year but had 65 points last year. He would be an unreal fit on our blue line ans hes signed at 4.5 for 4 more years.
Pulj amd patrick are both guys who could use a chamge.
What would you guys add to nurse+ pulj for ghost+ patrick ?
Ghost is having a down year but had 65 points last year. He would be an unreal fit on our blue line ans hes signed at 4.5 for 4 more years.
Pulj amd patrick are both guys who could use a chamge.