So...does preseason game means something or not? Why do we judge rookies for their ability to stick around but can't judge vets for their ability to perform against weaker lineups?
I can't speak for others - but there's really only 2 things I look for in preseason.
- No injuries to key players
- To see how rookies (i.e. players who have never played in the NHL before) perform and have progressed over the summer
Pour le reste? Je m'en bat les couilles.
And to this day, some people for Jesperi, had suggested to send him down in the AHL. To this day, I have no idea how that could be seen as extremely negative. A Pacioretty at the start of his career suggested to the Habs to get his ass down if they were not going to use him a lot so that he'd get his confidence back. Let say that happens to Kotka....that would really destroy him? I'm not advocating to do so just yet....but I don't see how that's scapegoating to wish he'd go to the AHL for some games.
I don't see a reason to send Kotkaniemi down to the AHL...I find even the suggestion ludicrous at this stage.
He'd have to completely fall flat on his face this year for me to think he should go down to the AHL.
Overcoming adversity is a part of development...it's just not always going to be an upwards trajectory.
I just think that expectations with Kotkaniemie this preseason are totally out of whack with how the coaching staff has used and prepared him.
He's spent all of preseason dragging around a player who might get waived today (Charles Hudon) and Joel Armia, his ball and chain from the year prior.
Let's just take a deep breath...in 7 days from now no one will remember or even care about preseason performances.