Adriatic
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2004
- 6,524
- 4,089
Based on some of the trade proposals, I take it most of the people here have never watched Coyle play.
Based on some of the trade proposals, I take it most of the people here have never watched Coyle play.
Let's just say if Charlie Coyle (who i'm a fan of) and Jonas Brodin played like they did last night, on a more regular basis.Wild are clearly looking for pry away trade offers for Brodin and Coyle. Not sure if Danault fits for Brodin but I doubt Bergevin trades Danault. Time to move on from the Wild. They want a slam dunk return for players who are who they are at this stage and soon to be UFA.
Their cost to acquire starting point is way to high. No need to start negotiations when they keep talking Suzuki.
Figured most won't. Not sure I would either. Tatar provides more offense and has one more year in term left vs Coyle.
What about Tatar and Mete for Coyle and Brodin? If the Wild are interested this type of package, I'd consider adding a 3rd if they feel it's not enough on our end. Best I could do at that point though. Lets look at how Coyle and Brodin fit
Drouin / Domi / Coyle
Lehkonen / Kotkaniemi / Gallagher
Byron / Danault / Armia or Shaw
Kulak / Weber
Brodin / Petry
Lmao if that's their asking price they're going to be waiting all alone on the dance floor at the end of the night when everybody else has already found partners.Minnesota doesn't accept that.... They had a thread on the main board today asking for Suzuki and our 1st for Brodin.
Minnesota doesn't accept that.... They had a thread on the main board today asking for Suzuki and our 1st for Brodin.
Let's just say if Charlie Coyle (who i'm a fan of) and Jonas Brodin played like they did last night, on a more regular basis.
We wouldn't be hearing their names in rumors.
Lmao if that's their asking price they're going to be waiting all alone on the dance floor at the end of the night when everybody else has already found partners.
I would hate to trade Tatar cause he's become a fan favorite (Hey Max....Tataaaaaaar!). But we seriously need to ask ourselves if he is part of our cup contending future roster?
I'd hope no teams are that dumb but you just never know with some of the GM's todayConfidence demoralizer waiting to get a partner to dance with for sure. It's clearly a pry-away trade value attempt. Not going to fly with most of our Habs fan base. Suzuki for any player that could be available and on 2 or 3 year in contract term is not a smart move by the Habs or any other team. Maybe they find a sucker.
Not that he couldn't be, but I think he's more valuable to us as a trade chip than as a roster fixture... With lekhLekh, Byron, Drouin, Gallagher in place, and Suzuki, Ylonen, Ikonen, Evans in the system, we've got depth in the smallish top-9 winger area... While Tatar is the most skilled after Drouin, his impact is replaceable internally over next 2-3 seasons.
Leveraging him to upgrade on D, or add first round pick caliber prospects is advisable imo.
I'd hope no teams are that dumb but you just never know with some of the GM's today
A guy like Coyle won't make a huge difference right now. And the price to pay would be possibly too stiff. I certainly don't want Habs to give away one of their top prospects.
And, I would think even a DUMMY like Bergevin, or any DUMMY would. However, that deal is NOT on the table, and if it was suggested to the Wild via call, they would quickly terminate the communication.If I have this deal on the table I accepted it right now
And, that is EXACTLY what I am suggesting with these questions...LOL.If you have to ask you can't afford him , but in all seriousness he would be way to expensive for the Habs to acquire at this time.
Agreed , need to get a little bigger,
Against the west they get killed
Id rather keep Tatar and dangle Byron but I think management already made his choice there.Not that he couldn't be, but I think he's more valuable to us as a trade chip than as a roster fixture... With lekhLekh, Byron, Drouin, Gallagher in place, and Suzuki, Ylonen, Ikonen, Evans in the system, we've got depth in the smallish top-9 winger area... While Tatar is the most skilled after Drouin, his impact is replaceable internally over next 2-3 seasons.
Leveraging him to upgrade on D, or add first round pick caliber prospects is advisable imo.
Id rather keep Tatar and dangle Byron but I think management already made his choice there.
Tatar, Shaw, Petry are good sell high candidate. Lindgren, too imo.Yeah, their choice is to do nothing major and focus on depth moves with the hopes they turn out like Byron and Petry. By the time our youth is ready to make an NHL impact, guys like Tatar and Petry will need new contracts.
Critical path we are on. I hope our GM is willing to take a very hard look at who is part of the future potential cup contending core and sells assets high to accelerate the rebuild and youth focus in our roster.
Tatar, Shaw, Petry are good sell high candidate. Lindgren, too imo.