justafan22
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2014
- 11,629
- 6,249
His 44 point year was riding Stamkos and Kucherov 90 point coattails. He had 44 points in 60 games riding shotgun with them, and then 4 points in 20 after he was traded.They need players for next year, I’m not saying I know much about Namestnikov but seems like a guy you can re sign or, worst case scenario, flip him again for a fourth. I don’t see why he wouldn’t get a fourth at the deadline. He’s one year removed from a 44 point year and is only 26.
You fools thought he'd take advantage of Pittsburgh's centre injuries.
Ask those who thought so.Why would Pittsbugh take anything we'd be offering?
Ask those who thought so.
Teams do look for depth.I disagree he’s a good 2 way center and at deadline price always go up because teams want to add depth.
Also Zaitsev. From 0 to 4 in less than a year.Anisimov, Abramov, Namestnikov what's going on? Are we suddenly becoming The Russian team of NHL?
Tierney would be the ideal 3C for them when healthy... so why not?
Lol why does a team under the floor in actual salary need 750k retained ?
Lol why does a team under the floor in actual salary need 750k retained ?
Lol why does a team under the floor in actual salary need 750k retained ?
UFA at end of season is interesting however.
Why is a rebuilding team giving away draft picks for bottom 6 forwards my god man why do they make it so hard to like this team.
the Rangers are a lot better than the Sens and probably 15 other teams.He cant even make the rangers. Pierre Dorion needs to stop helping other teams out.
He is 2 years removed from scoring 44 points playing with Kucherov and Stamkos. It makes no ****ing sense.