Goulet17
Registered User
- May 22, 2003
- 7,942
- 3,786
I can't comment on the Isles and Pitt deals, but Sakic is gaining a reputation for this behavior. A time or two isn't a big deal, but repeatedly will cause other GMs to just not deal with Sakic.
In today's NHL, I think it would be closer to the norm that GMs don't pull the trigger on the vast majority of deals that are discussed.
From what I understand, there are many GMs that have the reputation as being slow to pull the trigger on trades these days and they are not ostracized. It seems that Garth Snow has that particular reputation himself.
If Sakic had a verbal agreement in principle on the parameters of a trade and he backed out, it would be one thing. I think it is entirely different to not accept proposals from another team.
Dreger, Lebrun, and Garrioch indicated that Ceci and Chabot were not on the table for an Ottawa trade. Dreger said that the NY Islanders were not trading Hamonic.
Pittsburgh has little in the way of prospects and younger players that I find particularly enticing, especially on the defensive side.
Friedman, McKenzie, Lebrun, and Dreger indicated that Boston would not trade Carlo or McAvoy for Landeskog.
What do you think was being offered honestly? At least based on what is being reported by more mainstream credible sources, teams were not falling all over themselves to help the Avs with great value offers.
IMO, a trade of Duchene and Landeskog always made more sense in the offseason after the ED. It should not make much a difference in my mind whether a deal occurs now or at the draft.