I was joking, or did you miss the just kidding part? It was in jest about them wanting to bleed us dry, and acting like they are helping us by leaving money on the table to ice a team around them.
Yeah so was I.
I was joking, or did you miss the just kidding part? It was in jest about them wanting to bleed us dry, and acting like they are helping us by leaving money on the table to ice a team around them.
That is comparison without context
Matthews has a MUCH BETTER supporting cast than McDavid.
The comparison to McDavid without context is pure failure
This has to be the only fanbase in all of sports that whines and complains when their team signs its marquee young star player to a contract extension.
Greatest fans in the world.
You were using age left on current deals to compare salary allocation. Making the point you are getting Matthews, etc. for their salaries at their age as opposed to the Tampa salaries at their ages. My point was look at what Kucherov's salary was at through those ages, Stamkos' and Hedman's. It wasn't 11.634. What do you think the salary on Matthews and Marner (if we can keep them) will look like on their 3rd contracts?
I agree. It's a young man's game. More of the money is already being distributed to younger players, and I think this trend will continue.So I think the one caveat about this deal is that unlike in the past, there will be less of an increase when you get to the UFA years. Matthews may ask for a larger slice now, but he's not suddenly going to get the type of increase a typical RFA gets. He's already making his UFA money now, and when his UFA days come, he's going to continue to make close to this percentage. He may even make less than this percentage (ie. takes a 13.4x8 year deal, which will probably be a lower percentage in 5 years than he's getting now). Unless a team wants to seriously handicap their team or has little to no other star talent. That is ultimately what happened with Malkin and Crosby after their 5 year deals, or like Stamkos who just stayed at the same cap percentage, whereas guys with lower relative percentages (like Tavares, Kane, Toews) got much larger UFA raises.
The only difference is teams like EDM benefits from keeping McDavid at that lower number for a little bit longer, while Toronto has to pay Matthews his cap-increase adjustment earlier. However, that also means that his second deal ends earlier (i.e. 35) rather than later (i.e. 38), so we do not have to pay the prime money as long. So there are benefits either way.
The NHL is probably just heading in the direction of higher RFA deals and lower raises on UFA deals for most high end guys. You are not going to see too many marquee UFA signings for huge dollars anymore, unless they are rare cases like Tavares, but you will see guys (at least the higher end ones) start to really push their cap percentage peak on their first deal, and take term over AAV on their second one when they end in their mid-late 30's. Then the guys who are not core guys are going to have to settle for decent, but not amazing, money on their second deal (i.e. Kapanen making sub-3 mill on his deal for 3 years, when maybe 5-10 years ago he could probably get the cap-equivalency of close to 4) and start reaching their peak dollars on their second or even third deals. There will just be less money for role players who want to win.
McDavid's had Draisaitl as his wing for the past couple of seasons. Matthews had Nylander. Tell me how exactly McDavid has a better supporting cast. Why should it affect him if his 3rd line is dog****?
This has to be the only fanbase in all of sports that whines and complains when their team signs its marquee young star player to a contract extension.
Greatest fans in the world.
Do oilers have a :
Marner?
Kadri?
Rielly?
Garidner?
Andersen?
(and now Tavares)?
The stupidity of advnaced stat nerds amazes me when they look at one number and blow their load without any ****ing context
Do oilers have a :
Marner?
Kadri?
Rielly?
Garidner?
Andersen?
(and now Tavares)?
The stupidity of advnaced stat nerds amazes me when they look at one number and blow their load without any ****ing context
lmao.
says the guy who looks only at Total Points.
Look at it this way, maybe paying these guys now might means discount on their 3rd contracts when they know they need to take less and have a super Team with McDavid to win the Cup.
Personally, we have the rights to crap on Dubas and stuff but there is no denying that the team is a great team and is a contender
Agents don't get the final say, they work for their clients .McDavid taking a discount then having his team get WORSE with that discount probably played a role. No way the agents let Matthews do it to that extent.
I get what you are saying and it does have merit. It is just I feel like we got ahead of the cap here. We overpayed the growth on our most crucial contract, and I fear the ripple effect in a few years time with Rielly, Kapanen, Muzzin, Dermott, Johnsson, Andersen, etc. This AAV at that term bumps everyone up (but who knows by how much). 3 years is not that far away when we could have some big issues trying to keep a lot of the band together without huge cap growth, and then you have Matthews again 2 years later and likely Marner too.there's upside and downside.
they're going to be stuck paying all those guys in their 30s by the time we even have to negotiate with Rielly.
**** you Dubas!!!! **** you Auston!!!
I hope you both get boooed out of the building tomorrow
Funny, considering you're using raw point totals to prove whichever dumb*** point you're trying to prove.
McDavid taking a discount then having his team get WORSE with that discount probably played a role. No way the agents let Matthews do it to that extent.
i'm pretty sure other fanbases when they sign overpay for the amount of term. (which - I will point that that's what has people upset. the fact that it's 5 years but that much money) would be equally be upset. but hey. that's just me.
How does that affect his production though? If Oilers stack their first line, wouldn't that be beneficial to McDavid? Better support cast has to do winning the actual game, not point production. McDavid is the best player in the world, thus he gets a lot of touches and makes a lot of plays. Because of how stacked the leafs are, Matthews actually gets less touches with the puck. Just look the PP for example, where Marner controls the plays. The only time Matthews has a chance is for those cross-ice pass or shot in the slot. I would actually be interested if having more star players would actually decrease your point production because of how many fewer touches you get per game...Do oilers have a :
Marner?
Kadri?
Rielly?
Garidner?
Andersen?
Dermott?
(and now Tavares)?
The stupidity of advnaced stat nerds amazes me when they look at one number and blow their load without any ****ing context
I doubt it. HF is the only place where there is a full unreasonable outrage. I have not seen any place else (Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, etc) where people are this upset. Quite strange actually...it's a absolutely Looney tunes.
I swear there will be boos for Matthews next game.
Perhaps, but I can't think of any examples of teams resigning their 1st OA pick and being upset about it. Can you think of any?
Would we be happier not having him signed at all? Having another hold out or worse?
I find it sad that after years of being bottom feeders we finally have some terrific young players, and half the fanbase can't enjoy it because their wringing their hands over a salary cap issue that may or may not happen.