Orfieus
Registered User
1) The hit isn't clean. The on ice officials and the league have already determined that. You can moan and ***** about it all you want, but that doesn't change your opinion that it was clean - it wasn't. However even your comparison using Kadri vs Sedin is wrong, because Kadri got a hell of a lot more of the shoulder of Sedin then Wilson could even pretend to have gotten.
2) I never said there wasn't an option for Wilson to appeal the suspension he will be getting. He can and almost certainly will appeal it. I said that there's no chance he will win that. Because if he appeals, he appeals to Bettman. Do you really see Bettman wiping out the suspension? Not a chance in hell. He might get a couple games knocked off if DoPS grows some balls and hands out a big enough suspension (like 15+), but given that it's likely in the 8-12 game range, and with Wilson's very recent history of multiple hits like this (and subsequent suspensions for said hits), it's unlikely that anything will change.
As for having to get personal, just sad.
1) The on-ice officials have to make an instant judgment and usually don't have that much say in suspensions. With the Kadri hit on Sendin he was kicked out of the game but not suspended. And I'm arguing the hit is clean and you cannot show any proof of a dirty hit other then "he has an in-person meeting." I am 100% willing to admit I am wrong if there is a camera angle that shows his principal hit is to the head.
The whole point of me arguing for Wilson is because the video evidence we've all seen so far (and this is the point I am getting to) doesn't show that. However, maybe the league has a different camera angle we've haven't seen and might be why there is an in-person meeting
2) According to this, Flames' Wideman suspension reduced on appeal, when Wideman got his suspension reduced there is an NHL/NHLPA Neutral Discipline Arbitrator and in 2016 his name was James Oldham