Trading Savard is a popular call and I understand the reasons. I'm all for trading defensive assets, but Savard's one I'd give up reluctantly. He's a solid defensive player who rarely misses games. His pairing with Gavrikov has been strong.
For me Murray and Nuti would be the guys I'd attempt to move. Murray's durability questions (and answers) make him expendable though I realize less Market attractive. Kukan makes Nuti - someone O like - a trade candidate. Often playoff contenders are looking to bolster D and each could be dangled.
As to Wennberg, I'd be happy to be the bagman/errand boy with cash to complete the buyout but
@Cyclones Rock probably has seniority and will get that job.
Final thought - I think Taylor Hall very good but will be overpaid when the bidding starts. My take is that his Hart year won't be repeated.
I absolutely love David Savard. He’s probably my favorite player on the current roster. However, he’s pushing 30.
Murray and Savard are very similar. Both defensive defensemen. Both good players, Both UFAs in 2021. Similar current $$. Probably about equal trade value. Will probably want similar contracts when they hit free agency. They each, however, have one concerning flaw: Murray, it’s injuries; Savard, it’s age.
I think we should try to keep, beyond next season, exactly one of them, based on cap space, organizational depth, etc. I don’t think it makes sense to keep both; I don’t think it’s wise to keep neither (unless we absolutely can’t due to cap space). I imagine each would want (and get) something at 3-4 years and around $5M/year on the open market. So really it comes down to which you think is the better choice to take a flier on at that price? I happen to think Murray due to age. But if they went with Savard due to injury concerns with Murray and/or they like Savard better as a player, I’d understand and be fine with that, too. I think, whichever one we don’t keep, we prob should try to move for assets before the end of his deal.
I think Nuti should be moved only under the right circumstances. He’s got a pretty nice contract, and probably not as good trade value as either Murray or Savard. I suggested moving him for Gusev this summer, given VGK’s cap problems and his low hit. I hunk that’s the type of deal you should involve in; if a team is willing to pay a premium for a bona fide top-6 defensemen - possibly top-4 - on a cheap deal due to cap problems.
As for Hall, he could be the exact same price for one team as another and make complete sense for one team, while not making sense at that price for another. I think he’d make sense on our roster now, even if at what might be an overpay or more money than he’d be worth to other teams around this league. It’s likely I wouldn’t think he’d make sense on our roster, even at the exact same hypothetical price, if we still had last year’s roster. But we don’t, and we’re missing an elite forward.